Hillary Email: Overthrow Assad, Destroy Syria For Israel

The Obama Administration helped ignite the civil war in Syria as “the best way to help Israel,” a newly-released Hillary Clinton email published by Wikileaks has confirmed.

The document, case number F-2014-20439, number C05794498, is part of a mass publishing by Wikileaks of all the emails released by the Justice Department probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server during her time as Secretary of State from 2009 – 2013.

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” then-Secretary Clinton starts off the lengthy email.

Secretary Clinton then admits that negotiations with Iran will not prevent the Islamic Republic from enriching uranium, the key ingredient for building a nuclear weapon:

“Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world’s major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war.”

Secretary Clinton goes on to admit that the real concern over Iran’s atomic advancement is that it will end Israel’s nuclear monopoly in Middle East:

“Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

“An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.”

Secretary Clinton then draws the axis between Iran and Syria, and their combined threat to Israel. Toppling the Assad government, Secretary Clinton proposes, would solve this problem:

“It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria.

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.”

The end goal of toppling Assad is to make it easier for Israel to accept a nuclear Iran, Secretary Clinton writes:

“Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran’s strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran’s nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran’s program has crossed an unacceptable threshold.

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.”

Secretary Clinton then explains why the Obama administration should use rebel forces as proxies to overthrow Assad, as opposed to bombing him directly as was done in Libya. She also outlines the strategy, using allies in the region:

“The Obama administration has been understandably wary of engaging in an air operation in Syria like the one conducted in Libya for three main reasons. Unlike the Libyan opposition forces, the Syrian rebels are not unified and do not hold territory. The Arab League has not called for outside military intervention as it did in Libya. And the Russians are opposed.

Libya was an easier case. But other than the laudable purpose of saving Libyan civilians from likely attacks by Qaddafi’s regime, the Libyan operation had no long-lasting consequences for the region. Syria is harder. But success in Syria would be a transformative event for the Middle East. Not only would another ruthless dictator succumb to mass opposition on the streets, but the region would be changed for the better as Iran would no longer have a foothold in the Middle East from which to threaten Israel and undermine stability in the region.

Unlike in Libya, a successful intervention in Syria would require substantial diplomatic and military leadership from the United States. Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces. The announcement of such a decision would, by itself, likely cause substantial defections from the Syrian military. Then, using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time. But the rebellion is going to go on for a long time, with or without U.S. involvement.”

Interestingly, Secretary Clinton also believes Russia would never join an Allied coalition bombing of Syria. Of course, Russia unilaterally bombed Syrian targets years later:

“The second step is to develop international support for a coalition air operation. Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council. Some argue that U.S. involvement risks a wider war with Russia. But the Kosovo example shows otherwise. In that case, Russia had genuine ethnic and political ties to the Serbs, which don’t exist between Russia and Syria, and even then Russia did little more than complain. Russian officials have already acknowledged they won’t stand in the way if intervention comes.”

It should be noted that the Wikileaks transcript of the email is incorrectly dated to December 31, 2000, which is an obvious error due to references in the text to the Syrian Civil War, which began in March 2011, as well as references to the May 2012 negotiations in Istanbul between Iran and the west over its nuclear program. Most likely the actual date of the email is December 31, 2012. At the time, Clinton was Secretary of State for President Barack Obama.


  • Yes these prove Hillary revealed the hidden actual intent of US policy in a communications environment that was not secure. But . . .

    They also prove what a truly lame-brained idiot she is. And if she’s teliing the truth that this is also the Admin’s viewpoint, then Obama and his advisors should not be trusted with running a corner candy store for more than a few seconds at a time, if that.

    The logical fallacies and self-contradictions in the opinions she expresses as her own and the Admin’s abound — to such an extent that I’d be up all night naming and explaining them all. Begging the question is one logical error she commits in constructing her “logically” illogical viewpoint. The “fallacy of the stolen concept” is another. I’ve always known she was far from the brightest pebble on the beach, but I would not have guessed she was so utterly, downright STUPID.

    And even if, by some strange and amazing good luck the Admin’s original cowardly weak implementing of the military efforts to unseat Assad had worked, it would simply have created a worse situation, considering who would have replaced him. The whole crew in office now consists of no one but complete incompetents. The don’t know how to think, and they don’t know how to act even to implement their own insane policy goals.

    Her idea is like saying that in a hostage situation, when one of the kidnappers is loading his gun with the stated intent of murdering the hostages, rushing him is a poor choice. Far more logical would be for everyone to walk upstairs and try to figure out a way to get rid of the other kidnapper so the one downstairs will be left without a partner to facilitate the murders, rather than to deal directly with the immediate threat and THEN make a plan to handle the reduced remaining threat. HOW STUPID CAN SOMEONE IN THE POSITION OF SEC’Y OF STATE BE? A teenager would know better. A high school dropout would know better.

  • Assuming the email is authentic, it does NOT say Obama helped ignite the civil war in Syria, and it certainly does not say that he did so to help Israel. It says:

    ” Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces. The announcement of such a decision would, by itself, likely cause substantial defections from the Syrian military. Then, using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time. But the rebellion is going to go on for a long time, with or without U.S. involvement.”

    The statement that ”the rebellion is going to go on for a long time with or without US involvement” obviously means that, at the time the email was supposedly written, the rebellion was going on without US involvement. On the other hand, if you look at the two wars the US certainly DID start — Afghanistan and Iraq — both have greatly aided the Ayatollah regime. The Taliban was fiercely opposed to the mullahs, and Saddam Hussein fought a war against the mullahs. By greatly increasing the clerical fascist Iranian regime’s power, both these wars weakened Israel.

    From a military viewpoint, the country the US has helped most in the world is… Iran.

    • The Obama administration did help to ignite the civil war in Syria, specifically through the ways Jared Israel says – third party proxies in the region, specifically, “regional allies [….] to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces”.

      The rebels would never have been able to fight Assad for nearly five years now if it were not for American involvement. So, yes, the blood of millions of Syrians is ultimately on the hands of Obama and Clinton.

      And yes, it was for Israel’s benefit. The plan was/is to decapitate Assad so Israel would be more willing to accept a nuclear Iran.

      The Clinton-Obama plan means Iran loses, because it becomes a PEACEFUL nuclear power (Israel still remains the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons) while losing its most powerful military ally in the region, cutting off Iran’s ability to fight Israel.

      So while the layout of the gameboard shifts, the power balance in the region remains the same, with Israel remaining secure.

  • So then this is proof that both Hillary and Obama have a direct hand in the Christian Genocide happening in Syria and Iraq.

    Making them the Antichrist as the Bible says the Antichrist will overturn 3 kings in the Middle East.

    Read Daniel 7

  • Hillary Clinton is not working for the interests of the United States. She betrayed the United States. Hillary Clinton betrayed CIA. Hillary Clinton betrayed NSA. Hillary Clinton betrayed Pentagon. Hillary Clinton betrayed American military and intelligence communities. Hillary Clinton betrayed American people. HILLARY CLINTON CROSSED THE LINE.

    If Americans elect her as a President, they will sign the total failure of American nation. Hillary Clinton is a political dummy of Rothschilds and the City of London, so-called globalists, but, in reality, “Satanist-Zionist Alliance” of pedophiles, who taught American elite human sacrifice, drinking of infant blood and raping children.

    All these atrocities are the degenerative customs of the most wild tribes on the African continent copying the customs of animals on the way to the Planet of Apes.

    In Libya, Hillary Clinton killed on purpose the US ambassador J. Christopher Stevens who was for the two-state solution in Palestine in opposition to Israel’s plan for the “Great Israel” from Nile to Euphrates. Together with ambassador Stevens, Hillary Clinton killed a few CIA operatives who tried to save him.

    In this letter above, Hillary Clinton acknowledges that it was she who organized “moderate terrorists” for Israel as its proxy army for colonizing Arab lands from Nile to Euphrates. Those “moderate terrorists” all joined DAISH / ISIS / ISIL / IS ever since. While Abu Al Baghdadi, the head of DAISH / ISIS / ISIL / IS is Simon Elliot, a Mossad agent, according to the report by French Intelligence.

    As a secretary of State, Hillary Clinton used the Embassy in Libya for the shipping cash, arms and drugs for the “moderate terrorists”, all totally illegal, all without the approval of the US Congress and US Senate. Hillary Clinton, this serial murderer, who kills and lies and steals without a blink of an eye, transformed American Foreign Policy into Hooker’s House for getting dirty dividends front the foreign country of the City of London.

    Americans! Do you have any shame? Any pride? Any honor? Where is that honorable Land of the Free? Why do you allow CRIMINALS like Hillary Clinton to go around unpunished? CIA and NSA! Hillary Clinton killed your own! And if Satanists-Zionists will prevail, you will be the first to become biorobots with lobotomy via brain chips. Do you really want to become cyber slaves of the international crime group? Do you really want your children not even know what means to be a free man? CLINTONS SHOULD GO.

  • Pingback: CLINTONS SHOULD GO | IRENE CAESAR, PH.D. / ????? ??????, ????. ???????. ????

  • There’s also the matter of a Qatari pipeline to Turkey if Syria fragments the right way, an enormous economic advantage to the Sunni side of the street, and a bad enough result for Russia to make her commit to some level of warfare. Germany and Europe seem to be holding off from more Russian gas via the North Stream. What could those NATO people be waiting for, I wonder?

    Not saying that Qatar would go so far as to tip a few bob into somebody’s “Foundation”. But it’s a naughty world, and Arkansas is part of it.

  • Pingback: ??????????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ??????? | ?ZNAT?.ru ??????? ???

  • No difference between Republicans and Democrats. The CIA controls both. The Qatari pipeline is probably what makes more sense. The West should not interfere with the Middle East. Leave Arabia to the Arabs, unless they threaten the West. The sun rises from the East and sets in the West. Nobody can change that, not even the USA and its allies, including Israel.

  • Well, this explains why Ambassador Stevens was meeting with Al Qaeda terrorists the day before he was murdered. He was arranging to send terrorists to go to Syria to fight against Assad. This explains the ship loads of weapons leaving Lebanon and going to Syria. This explains why Hillary Clinton is sometimes referred to as one of the founders of ISIS.

  • Pingback: Hillary Email: Overthrow Assad, Destroy Syria For Israel – I Know it's Crazy but…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.