Comments on: Savage Still Banned In Britain

By: Ron

Ron — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:12:41 +0000

Frank and Mike's issue it between them. If there is a legal issue, take it to court.

The issue here is the loss of freedom of speech. Loss of our freedoms begins slowly and gets worse and worse. "I offended" is rediculous! So you're offended. I have a right to offend you and you me! You don't have to like me nor me you. That is not a reason to ban someone or take away their rights. Of course, this is England, not America we're talking about.

Get ready though. It's coming here next. We have to stand up when it does!

By: The Great Frank

The Great Frank — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:26:28 +0000

I was the first to use the phrase "liberalism is a mental disorder". He was second and because he was in SF at the time he tought that no one would find out that I was first!! And yes, I have the tape and it can be dated to when I thought it up. "Little Mugabes"? I was the first to use it on TRP!!!! At least a year before him!!! "Allahland"? I was again first and he was again, second!!! There is alot more, and these are not just "coincidences", there are just too many to be!! Oh, and of course an Ohio station that carries him used the phrase, "Get The Right Perspective" with Mike Savage!!! Sure, it just "happened", didn't it? And yes there is a tooth fairy!! You just can't accept it that your hero is the nothing. A Bronx blowhard! Columbus? Check out the Best of Frank and John and my Columbus remarks. They were way before your hero. Solutreanism, I am the only one who has propagated it. He says, "I know my history". Really? He knows cliches and just repeats them. No depth, no intellect. Anything he "knows" he got from TRP and me! Sorry to burst your bubble, but he is the nothing, a loudmouth, and jerk and suckers like you follow him. Let him go walk his mangy dog and feed him the scraps from his meals at cheap greasy resturants he goes to!!! How can he be number three, when there is Hannity and Beck? Levin beats him out in the ratings, so what number is really? He says, "people are stealing from me". A good way to cover up his theft of my ideas. For your poor sake, even if he wasn't, he's so way behind me, that it's pathetic!! And you fall for his crap? Listen to TRP, and you'll find out who's first and innovative!

By: Someone who knows Fr

Someone who knows Fr — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:58:02 +0000

To Little Frankie:

I am listening to Savage since 1995 or 1994 when KSFO started in SF. He is making more sense that you ever did. So he is bragging about his double PhD, so what? Does it hurt you? Don't listen, nobody is perfect.

And no, he is not ripping you off, he's been saying the Columbus story for at least 12 years as far as I know. You wish you were being ripped off.

One day when we all lose speech rights, then you will recall why Savage was fighting them.

Frankie, You poor little nothing…

By: The Great Frank

The Great Frank — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:48:29 +0000

Why ban him? He is just a huckster who ripped me off time and again. He has no substance. What are they banning? His discussing his dog, and the cheap restaurants he eats at? His screaming is no substitute for conviction and principles. What else are they banning him for? Telling you that he has two PhD’s? That he wrote 25books that were filled with cliches and ghost written? Being banned is great for him as it makes him look like he’s doing something important and being a martyr. He says that he’s number three in the ratings, so does Beck, Levin, ect. He is the outsider in high school who was jealous of the “in crowd” of Limbaugh, Hannity, O’Reilly, ect. He proves that if you sound like you know something, even though you don’t people will think you do!

By: Mike Savage

Mike Savage — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:35:31 +0000

It's a disgrace.

By: Steve225

Steve225 — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:39:45 +0000

David is right. I don’t care for Savage’s show, so I don’t listen. Still, he has an audience which keeps him on the air, and he matters to them enough to get the ratings. No matter what, freedom of speech is one of our most important rights. If we lose it, say goodbye to all talk, including Frank and John.

Government has no role in controlling the speech of the public. That should hold true for any civilized nation, which Britain supposedly is. I’ll stand behind Savage on this.

Does anyone else out there remember when we had the fairness doctrine?

By: heller22

heller22 — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:39:54 +0000

hey remeber mike’s tv show !!!!!!! , point set match! off course he should not be ban but he is a moron who steals material and still gets it wrong! I say he is an man with no self control.

By: heller22

heller22 — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:30 +0000

RON U ARE AN IDIOT DUH PLAIN AND SIMPLE HAAAAA…… GOOD POINT RON

By: Expertman_2000

Expertman_2000 — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:49:36 +0000

Should be banned from 49 of the 50 (or is it 57?) states. I'll let you guess which one would allow him.

By: david

david — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:49:38 +0000

We should all be troubled when speech deemed offensive by a few beaurocrates becomes a tool to restrict travel. What is next, denial of property rights. Nice speech is not in need of proctection because we all agree it is nice; it is that speech which may be offensive, whether political or otherwise, which we should all welcome not necessarily because we agree with its content but its symbol of freedom. Is what Michael Savage said possibly worse than those who burn the flag in the name of free expression. It is for this reason alone that Michael Savage should be defended and the U.K. called to task.