King Tut
Recently-leaked DNA test results prove ancient Egyptian royal Pharaoh Tutankhamen, aka King Tut, is 99.6% Western European.
The results were mistakenly leaked in the American cable television show Royal Blood: King Tut Unwrapped. The tests were conducted to find out if a newly-discovered mummy was the boy king’s father.
The Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, had previously stated that he would never reveal the DNA results of King Tut, whose racial make-up has been a source of dispute for many.
The above video shows a series of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), repeated DNA sequences whose characteristics are used to identify humans.
European Distribution of the R1b haplogroup
Racial historian Arthur Kemp took the above STR results and put them into a Haplogroup Predictor created by retired physicist and professor Whit Athey. The resulting haplogroup, which gives insight into the ancestral background of an individual going back thousands of years, came back with a 99.6% match with the R1b haplogroup.
The R1b haplogroup “is the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup in Europe reaching its highest concentrations in Ireland, Scotland, western England and the European Atlantic seaboard — in other words, European through and through,” writes Kemp.
No related posts.
I am going to add this too as well
http://stewartsynopsis.com/evolvement_of_king_tut…
oh one more thing blacks did not just created Egypt but also created earlier civilizations
Right, then how come none of the mummies look like the Nubian one ? There are hundreds of Egyptian mummies besides Ramses…And none have kinky hair. Its all straight hair. Your argument falls flat on its face.
did you that a good look at the videos I gave. I think the Ramses body is fake. If you look at Ramses nose on statues and other pictures of he looks black with big lips. The so called Ramses has small lips and a crooked nose. Also he does not fit the historains view of Ramses. All again there black people with read straight hair that is if you look at any of the links I gave.
I just want to add you can trace people by their language and those Arabs were not in the land at the time more proof here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL-Bn8aNIVU
sorry no white people in the land none! it matches historians
I dont delve into speculation, just the facts. Dna is a fact. Mummies are facts.
As for your links, most of them show Nubians, or Egyptian murals made during the period of Nubian rule. Those are also VERY late Egypt, when Egypt was on its way out and was known to have been under Nubian rule.
Early Egypt, when it was at its height, was clearly a Caucasian society [verified by physical evidence..such as DNA, dental comparisons, Mummies etc..].
As for you claiming Ramses mummy is a fake…your just desperate. The modern Egyptians, who are neither white or black today, state that is his mummy. The carbon dating of the mummy also verifies its age….Everyone who is genuinely working in that field and has studied the mummy of Ramses and his tomb acknowledge that is Ramses. And his mummy is not out of the ordinary, the exception is negro looking mummies in Egypt, not Caucasian.
Anyways, more physical proof…
Oldest Egyptian mummy to date, known as Ginger, for her red hair -
http://www.egyptorigins.org/ginger.htm
Hair analysis of the mummies found at Hierakonpolis [3400 BC, oldest mummies found to date]-
“”The vast majority of hair samples discovered at the site were cynotrichous (Caucasian) in type as opposed to heliotrichous (Negroid), a feature which is standard through dynastic times . . .
Close inspection revealed that the natural hair (from the grave of a woman), of slightly more than shoulder-length, had been augmented with a considerable number of artificial lengths of false hair, very reminiscent of modern dreadlocks, meticulously worked into the natural hair to create an imposing high coiffure. The complex styling techniques made it clear that her particular hairstyle was the result of many hours of careful work carried out by someone other than herself. This particular discovery is therefore extremely significant as it is the earliest evidence for the use of false hair in Egypt (if not the whole of the ancient world), predating previous examples by at least 500 years.
And, if this wasn’t sufficient, the same lady also provided us with the earliest evidence for the use of hair dye. Indepth examination showed a contrast between the auburn cast of her dark brown hair and a smaller number of unpigmented white strands of hair associated with the aging process. The unpigmented hair had been turned the bright orange color typical of henna, a vegetable dye made from the powdered leaves of the shrub Lawsonia inermis. This shrub grows yet in the area and is still used for the same purpose by the local population, who kindly showed us where the best henna bushes were to be found
Although most of the hair found is the natural dark brown color, natural red hair was also discovered in association with male Burial No. 79, his hair originally falling in a wavy style ending in small ringlet-type open-center curls. Together with other burials, this reveals the great attention paid to appearance, the hair obviously of great importance to both men and women alike. There were clearly a great range of styles by this early date, from extremely short crops little more than I cm long as noted in Burial No. 76 (a female of c.25-30 years) to longer styles, as demonstrated by the large quantity of dark brown wavy hair set in partially twisted lengths recovered intact in association with Burial No. 91. Although the hair itself was discovered completely detached from the skull, it was possible to determine that it would originally have been set at shoulder length.
The best preserved hair, however, was found in the well padded Burial No. 85 (nicknamed Paddy), a female of c.20-25 years of age. Careful removal of the upper layers of matting and linen pads allowed the hair to be preserved intact on the head, particularly the delicate free-hanging hair ends around the shoulder area that give the most accurate idea of the original hair length. Further study back in the lab revealed an original shoulder length style of natural waves, extending c.22 cm from the crown, with a left side parting and an asymmetrical fringe made up of S-shape curls bordering the eyes. In addition to the excellent preservation of Paddy’s cranial hair, her right eyebrow had also survived intact beneath the layers of protective wrappings, “”
Wiki article on the mummies and thier appearance from the oldest known mummy burial site-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginger_%28mummy%29
“In 1967 a series of X-rays and photographs of all mummified bodies in the British Museum’s Egyptian Antiquities collection provided a detailed published analysis including the mummies from the Gebelein excavations. The findings are summarized below:[11]
Id Length Age and sex Findings summary
32751 1.63 metres (5.3 feet) Male adult All teeth present and healthy. Fractures to ribs, right pubic ring, both thigh bones, shin and calf bones. No evidence of arthritis. Left index finger and several last toe bones are missing. Tufts of ginger-coloured hair on the scalp.
32752 1.51 metres (5.0 feet) Female adult Fractures to skull and many fractures of the body occurring after death, but the bones were otherwise healthy. Long brown hair present on the scalp.
32753 1.49 metres (4.9 feet) Adolescent, sex uncertain The skull may not belong to the body. The teeth are worn. There are fractures in all ribs, left tibia and right thigh bone. There are lines of arrested growth in the tibia. The thorax and abdomen is packed with linen.
32754 1.6 metres (5.2 feet) Male adult There is a square-shaped opacity in the skull, teeth are healthy. There are fractures in the 9th rib, the right femur and a crack fracture left of the sciatic notch. Several fingers missing and left hand detached at the wrist. There are tufts of brown hair on the remains of the scalp.
32755 1.52 metres (5.0 feet) Elderly adult, sex uncertain Bones are decalcified, consistent with senile osteoporosis. The body was probably in a wicker basket and covered with an animal skin with wicker and fur remnants still present and patches of linen on the body surface. All teeth present with caps worn. Many ribs are fractured. Only wrist bones of the left hand remain. Legs are detached due to fractures mid-shaft of both thigh bones. There are lines of arrested growth in the tibia. The last bones of most toes are missing.
32756 1.51 metres (5.0 feet) Adult, probably male There are remnants of bandages at the neck, pelvis and right ankle. The skull is detached with some incisors missing but remaining teeth healthy. There are fractures in the ribs and left femur. One arm is dislocated at the elbow joint and the left hand is detached at the wrist as are both feet.”"
The first heart transplant was performed in South Africa. Look it up. I’ve been reading your posts. You are completely ignorant. Know that. I hope you are young, because that would mean you haven’t had a lot of time to spue this nonsense. If you are older and you have children, then that’s a shame. This is the reason ignorance prevails, because of louder ignorant people. Why don’t you just come out and say you are a racist instead of making up shit as you go along. It is so clear that you don’t know what you are talking about, it’s crazy. You didn’t read any of the things you said anywhere. No one has written that the Java man was the original man. No one. If you read that in some white supremecist rag, then take that and wipe your ass with it. “The African didn’t have the wheel”? What the hell is that? Africans were smelting, iron before the European knew the process existed. The Greeks built Alexandria based on the knowledge they obtained from the so-called Egyptians. The Greeks came into Khemet for centuries to attend their universities. I’m not going to go on because it’s a waist of time and effort. You’re a racist and you will probably never change, so to hell with you.
sorry, they did not "create" earlier civilizations. Can you name them? This is nothing more than revisionist crap. Afro centrism is a joke and they know it! When you can't live with who you are, just make up crap to feel better about yourself. The lie is also that homo sapiens originated in Afrika. Not true! Java man, was older and the original man. This is all done to create the illusion that Afrikaans are the original man, since there is nothing that came from Afrika in regards to civilization. If they were so "advanced", then how come they were not able to create the glorious civilizations of the West? Mesopotamia got nothing from Egypt, it independently originated, and was much older than Egypt. Egypt is only important in regards to civilizations for those who want to believe that it reflects on them in the here and now. How do you have Egyptians with Nordic features? After then built Stonhenge, they sailed the Mediterranian sea to Egypt and brought learning to them. They interbred with various black Afrikaans who were on the outskirts of Egypt. They founded the Pharanonic dynasties. Meanwhile, White Men walked on the moon, and in sub Saharan Afrika they didn't even invent the wheel. They were living in huts, practicing magic, and we were Transplanting hearts. Who the hell are you kidding?
desperate my foot did you take a good look at my links! sorry no white man in egypt at that time. truths hurt! your statements not even ling up with ancient historians..
I can picture the so called white red crying from getting burned by the sun and then dying from skin cancer ahahaha
I believe the anceint historians more than you believe wiki and wiki is a weak creatable source of information. Also I want to point that dna can be faked too proof found here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORGhm26nJnk
here is another great link
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_2742.shtml
you dod know that Nefertiti is king tut mom right who is black! proof found here
http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/dna-detective-work-sheds-light-on-king-tuts-life-lineage-death/19354862?icid=main
and video proof found here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9PSMNKVWMA&feature=related
sorry try again! ahhahahahaha
here is a list of some of them right here
http://africanhistory.about.com/od/kingdoms/PreCo…
http://wysinger.homestead.com/africanhistory.html
I am sure I could find a lot more
here I am going to add a few more videos on early African civilizations
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZdyQaTJOOw&fe…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFJ85YkTQ50&fe…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E45FZawD2N8&fe…
you ever hear of the land of cush and Sumeria
Here i just wanted to add one more video more proof that the ancient Egyptians are black
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGeuDIMcu7s&fe…
These “videos” are pure bullshit. They pick and chose to make their case. They have no factual basis. As for the Sphinx having it’s nose shot off. It wasn’t because the French troops in Egypt didn’t want a black face on the Sphinx, it was the ARABS who shot it off. They just used it for target practice. No racial reasons there, except in those sick minds. The “Afrikan civilizations” that you proport to show in those same videos, are discredited and have been disproven. This goes back to the nonsensical book, “Stolen Legacy”, which is one of the worst cases of black racist propaganda. Have you read any of the books that disprove this? Of course not! You ignorantly want to believe this crap because you feel inferior.
yea places like mali is just so fake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op3qQ2z3h9k&fe…
If you would research the Timbuktu scrolls you would see? that? math, astrology, science, philosophy, medicine, and the daily lives of Africans were written down eons before Socrates, Plato, Aristotle even existed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYMkTxNQGGU&feature=PlayList&p=F7929D90A64000A6&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=7
do you? want to where Arab’s came from. You trace a people by their language. There is a really youtube video called
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL-Bn8aNIVU
sorry i mean to say do you where Arab’s came from you trace the people migration by their language.
here i want to add one more link this one on ancient Timbuktu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JlW_fBhw4g&feature=related
The phantasy about Timbuktu is a joke! When the French explorer found it, it was a typical Afrikan shithole. The “writing” came from the Arabs, not from the Bantoe. This is archaeism at it’s worst! Mali, well by golly, it couldn’t hold a candle to Greece or Rome, or any great Western nation. Using the Greeks to say that the Bantoe was more “advanced”? Writings? There was no writing in sub Saharan Afrika! No produce some authentic writings that are not something that was stolen from the Greeks and changed to make it look authentic. You can’t!! Oh, and can you name me an Afrikan Albert Swietzer? Ans: NO!!!
language and writing was made by blacks not Greeks! everything move south not north sorry. Even the ancient historians would agree.
Ancient West African Megacities
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LkpJdll9A&feature=related
I will also add this link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0evT4yCzBsU&feature=related
one more lik this one about the kingdom of cush
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmGKU4TGS70
Listen to this idiot! Moving South? How come sub Saharan Afrika didn’t have writing or the wheel? No pyramids, nothing to connext them to the Egyptians. Oh, and writing did begin in Sumeria. It’s written as “Kush”, not “Cush”! The Arab word for slave is “Kushite”. Using your “logic”, slavery started in Afrika, then came north where it was emmulated. Rape, Afrika, murder, Afrika, sodomy, Afrika, theft, Afrika, ect. Revisionism, is nonsense! You are trying to use a model for Afrika that is not Afrikaan! You believe in Diffusion. One place and it moves out. Inncorrect! So let’s see, the Beringians in Mexico had a form of writing. They must have somehow gotten it from Afrika!!! How ignorant!!!
Oh really do you know what color Canaanites are, do you know what they even look like?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrEEwKMLdVs
yea Canaanites magically appeared in the middle east
Here is the real truth there were no white people in the land at that time none!
by the way Greece loved blacks like the Egyptians, Nubian and Ethiopians. I fact the greeks use to get educated by black people
Wrong! Drama, Greek, Philosophy, Greek, Science, Greek, Archimedes was a Greek, Plato, Aristotle, all of the above and numerous more were Greek and got nothing from black Afrika. Can you name me the Afrikaans who created these institutions? Not just some worthless statement!
here i have some good you tube links for you on the real greeks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYhwpFIXaQ8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZuC-WivU-k&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1knWGhGRXk&feature=related
oh news up date king tut has disorder sickle cell disease this mean he is black!
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-an…
@dreamunk what the hell r u talking about? timbuktu is not older than greece, u lettin this racist white dude clown u..
@great frank sub-saharan africans did have writing, y dont u look it up? all of those greeks u named learned from the egyptians they admitted it, also they learned how to write from phonecians they never developed their own writing,.but west africans did. you say africans didnt invent the wheel, but actually nobody knows who invented the wheel but we do know africans and asians had it thousands of years b4 europeans. and u do realize that french explorer found timbuktu hundreds of years after its downfall? and that shit about stonhedge lol, u just camet up with that off the top of your head, that dont even deserve a reply.
Before you get too excited – I’m r1b as well and from a Lithuanian Jewish background. There is another r1b origin in Central Asia, separate to the Western European one, and it is thought that some of these people in present day Turkey were ancestors of some of today’s Jews and middle easterners. R1b genes turned up 25,000 years ago, well before “Egyptian” or “Jewish” or any of these labels existed. I guess it is unlikely that Tut was a black African, but it would also be unlikely he was closely related to the Basques or the Welsh. Probably a middle easterner.
Problem is, the DYS haplogroup occurs in ARABS to, NOT just Western European, NOT by mixing either – certain Black African tribes also have the DYS haplogroups- NOT by mixing either. – King Tut appears to be a mix of Arab Semitic White,possibly some Indo European Aryan White(Western European- very little in that region at that time),Black, and Asian(grandmother Queen Tiye is believed to be a mix of White, Black, and Asian)heritage – since 5,000 B.C. Egypt has been 65% Arab Semitic White(mostly Northern Egypt(Lower Egypt), 30% Black(mostly Southwestern(Upper Egypt- part of Kemet/Sudan/Nubia-annexed in 1521 B.C.)-Black/Arab Semitic White mix, and 5% other ethnic groups- I hardly believe King Tut was Western European.
Can Western Europeans live in a desert environment with no shirt on, like the wall paintings depict?
I am half black and Spainish and if they take a DNA sample from me i appear to be in the range of “white” but i look nothing like a white person this testing is very vague and they are jumping to the conclusion of them being white.I believe if they were “white people” then they would look more like me tan with black hair which is a feature pure white people can’t have unless mixed with a race containing black hair also all the depictions of the pharoahs on the walls have them painted brown or a dark redish tan they had many colors to paint with so if they were white they would have depicted them in that tone..
how can king tut mother be black and tut be white can anyone tell me that??
King Tut and death possibly due to Sickle Cell Disease:
There are four markers to test to determine whether Afrikan or not, since apparently the Senegal and Saudi-Asian are mild forms:
"Sickle-cell gene mutation probably arose spontaneously in different geographic areas, as suggested by restriction endonuclease analysis. These variants are known as Cameroon, Senegal, Benin, Bantu and Saudi-Asian. Their clinical importance springs from the fact that some of them are associated with higher HbF levels, e.g., Senegal and Saudi-Asian variants, and tend to have milder disease."[Green NS, Fabry ME, Kaptue-Noche L, Nagel RL (Oct 1993)]
Having said that, if King Tut died from Sickle Cell Disease (not just anemia), his form must have been one of the more severe Afrikan markers or at least a combination of a severe form and a mild form which was ultimately fatal.
“SCD (SICKLE CELL Disease), while inherited at birth, is most likely to result in fatal complications between childhood and early adulthood…
Aappaarently Hawass was asked if SCD was possible?
…A family tree of King Tut, suggested by Hawass himself, appears to further the German team's case.”
Now even if the test comes back negative, Hawass has already confirmed that both Tut’s parents had to have the trait, therefore, both are Afrikan!” Hawass may not have realized that by conceding SCD was a possibility, that he told the truth inadvertently about the Afrikan heritage of Tut's parents. Either way, Hawass has let out the truth.
Perhaps now we can find out the whole truth now that these German scientists managed to catch Hawass off guard!
Tutankhamun was not black: Egypt antiquities chief
AFP – September 25, 2007
Egyptian antiquities supremo Zahi Hawass insisted Tuesday that Tutankhamun was not black despite calls by US black activists to recognise the boy king’s dark skin colour.
“Tutankhamun was NOT BLACK, and THE PORTRAYAL OF ANCIENT EGYPTIAN CIVILISATION AS BLACK HAS NO ELEMENT OF TRUTH TO IT,” Hawass told reporters.
“EGYPTIANS ARE NOT ARABS AND ARE NOT AFRICANS DESPITE THE FACT THAT EGYPT IS IN AFRICA,” he said, quoted by the official MENA news agency.
Hawass said he was responding to several demonstrations in Philadelphia after a lecture he gave there on September 6 where he defended his theory.
Protestors also claimed images of King Tut were altered to show him with lighter skin at the “Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs” exhibit which leaves Philadelphia for London on September 30.
The exhibition sparked an uproar when it kicked off in Los Angeles in June 2005 when black activists demanded that a bust of the boy king be removed because the statue portrays him as white.
The face of the legendary pharaoh, who died around 3,300 years ago at the age of just 19, was reconstructed in 2005 through images collected through CAT scans of his mummy.
The boy king’s intact tomb caused an international sensation when it was discovered by Briton Howard Carter in 1922 near Luxor in southern Egypt.
Oh for heaven’s sake SOMOSUNO give it a rest.
(September 12, 2010, 7:13 pm, http://www.therightperspective.org/2010/06/06/king-tut-dna-99-6-western-european/#comment-110835)
Funny that you don’t show your source, huh? That other page where you posted your racist and irrational comments?
Aren’t you embarassed to get all desperate like that?
The German team was speculating, but of course, being a typical afrocentrist racist, you jump on the bandwagon and assume that to be the truth.
First of all, the very deadly Falciparum malaria parasite was found in Tutankhamun. That is where the ‘died due to malaria’ thing comes from. SCD is there to prevent malaria – the parasites die because they cannot live in the sickle cells, so the moment they entered his body, they would have died and would not have had a chance to multiply and make him sick.
Second of all, the Germans were making assumptions, they did not do any tests. Since SCD is a genetic disease, it would have shown up in the DNA tests.
And aside from that, if his parents were brother and sister (hence the defects) as they have said is the case according to genetic testing, and his Y-DNA is 99.6% Western European, then how the hell could he be African? The mummies in his maternal line (eg Tiye) had long red hair, not frizzy black hair. It’s impossible for him to be black.
So get over it. Enough with the taqiyya and the selective copy & paste. It’s getting irritating and you’re embarassing yourself…
Scientific Evidence for Black Egypt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-S_OoamU6k
Scientific examination of the remains of Tutankhamun have revealed that the boy king was: 1) significantly dolichocephalic, or long-headed; 2) had enlarged incisors; and 3) had a pronounced alveolar prognathism, resulting in an overbite and a concomitant receding chin.[6] Although various experts have pointed out that skull shapes etc., are not a reliable indication of ancestry,[7] in the fields of forensic criminology and forensic anthropology these characteristics are believed by some to indicate a Negroid person.[8]
Biological anthropologist Susan Anton, the leader of the American team on the Tut reconstruction project, said that the race of the Tut skull was “hard to call”. She stated that the shape of the cranial cavity indicated an African, while the nose opening suggested narrow nostrils, which is usually considered to be a European characteristic. The skull was thus tentatively concluded to be that of a North African.[9][10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_identity_of_Tutankhamun
sorry no such thing as white people in Egypt wishful thinking
Egyptians are African Nubian.mp4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvJ0F299kFQ&feature=related
the paintings of king tut as brown doesnt matter, right? just racist trying to continually brainwash a bigot wanting society. people need to grow up and start thinking for themselves instead of letting jackass racist scientist determine who was who. the paintings speak for themselves
Exactly, the heiroglyphics and sculptures have people who have black features. How can King Tut be 99% European in a country full of Africans??? Even his mom looked like a black woman.
I am not surprised they do that to a lot of black ancient civilizations so they can say blacks never done anything here is another example right here.
Arab or African? The Swahili part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsoPMbt5CZM&feature=re%C2%ADlated%EF%BB%BF
they even try ed to say that Berbers and moors were not black what a joke
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6wuc2R1_Mo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8M1ey6U5io
even the ancient Hebrews was black some of those Muslim know that too.
ancient egyptians were not WHITE or SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN!!!they were EAST AFRICANS…just look a ETHIOPIAN OR SOMALI PERSON AND CAMPARE IT TO ANCIENT EGYPTIANS!
What white person do you know that has lips like that? Ok, there are a few, but just look at his face, that is an African boy, half-caste at best. It has already been proven anyway, by Egyptologists, that the early Pharonic dynasties were African people. The latter dynasties, like those that presided shortly before the demise of Khemet, were of Asian and European origin. Ancient Khemet, by European Egyptologists estimations, had been in existence for five thousand years. There weren’t any Europeans, Asians or anything else ruling in Africa five thousand years ago! Stop kidding yourselves! By African estimations, the people who can tell African culture just by looking at it, Ancient Khemet could be traced back ten thousand years! All of this IS PROVEN FACT! First irrefutibly proven by African scholars, then corroborated by European scientists. There is no dispute. Pre-dynastic and early dynastic Khemet, up to the 25th dynasty, were exclusively African! Get over it. When Khemet was conquered for the first time by the Hyksos, post 25th dynasty, then you began to see the transfer of power between Asiatics and Europeans. What’s more, Asiatic and European conquerors of antiquity didn’t have the racists, supremecist elements that are so prevelant amongst those two groups today. In fact, foreign conquerors were quick to take a Khemetic wife and adapt as best as possible elements of their culture into that of the Africans. It’s extrememly well documented by Greek scholars like Herodotus, the respect that the Europeans had for the Khemites and their culture. What’s more, what we know of ancient Khemet, Biblically, has been proven over and over again, to be completely false, by even European scholars. For example, the notion that Jews were slaves and were the people that built the Grandfather, the Father and the Son (the three great pyramids) is absolute comedy on its face, why, 1. because there weren’t any people called Jews in ancient Khemet. Jews are from Europe. Jews adopted the HEBREW culture during the Crusades between the Christians, European non-Christians and Muslims. 2. The Khemites maticulously documented all of their history! THEY WERE THE FIRST PEOPLE TO DO IT (on papyrus and in stone)! The idea of writing anything down, on paper or anything else, came from Khemet! Thus stated, there are no stories ANYWHERE of slaves called Jews having built the pyramids! There are however, countless stories of how workers left their land during the inundation (slight flooding of the land) to come into the city to work on the monuments! 3. The three pyramids at Giza, had been built 700 years, before the arrival of the first HEBREW! How’s that for FACTS? All you have to do is read one book to learn anything about Khemet. It’s all in the books and they’re not hard to find. Imagine, the people of ancient Khemet were an extremely spiritual and cultural people, as are most Africans. They held steadfast to their history and made reference to it ALL THE TIME! “WE CAME FROM THE FOOTHILLS OF THE MOUNTAIN OF THE MOON, WHERE GOD HAPI DWELT”. That location has been well documented by any and every scholar to be in the region of Southern Sudan/Kenya. Khemet aside, Africans from the not too distant past I might add, from every region of the continent built monumental cities. Cities and towns that dwarfed anything in Europe and Asia at that time in history. In fact, there used to be a television show that came on, with a European host (forget his name, died recently, older man) that recounted story after story about the historical achievements of African people in Africa and the European and Asian’s relentless effort to wipe them off of the historical map. This is something Black people need to know. When the Asiatic/Europeans or Arab/like peoples first began to travel the ancient trade routes DOWN the east coast of Africa, they discovered cities, monuments and vessels that completely destroyed their ignorant world view. So much so, that shortly after initially visiting these places, they would come back and suprisingly sack the entire location, killing everyone in sight. They would then destroy the city, its buildings, streets and walls. BASIL DAVIDSON! That’s his name! His shows have got to be on YouTube! LOOK HIM UP!!!!!!!! For all of you who want to hear the FACTS! HA! As well, for all of you right wingers who think that all throughout history, white and whitish people are the only people who could have possibly built anything, the Europeans did in fact, after the Spanish annexed the Moors from Spain after 900 years of Moorish rule, took it upon themselves to “write the African out of history”! Their words, not mine! They actually said they would do it and they did! Who is they? I believe it was the same people who organized Christianity at the Council of Nicea. Look it up. This is the reason you white people and black people or anyone else for that matter don’t know anything about Africa! Think about it for one second before you keep reading. Ask yourself, why in the world is Africa so screwed up? Think about history and the way things really transpire, not how it happens on tv, where two and three hundred years are left out between scenes. As soon as the first European and Asiatic traders saw what Africa had to offer, Africa has know nothing but war and desolation – until recent years, Africa is actually on the rise. Just think about it. I went to school in Ghana and even after Europeans and every other non-African have virtually inserted a pipe into Ghanaian soil to drain it of its resources, gold still comes from the ground when it rains. Think about it. It has alway been about Africa. The center of the world. For all my people, I love you. Don’t listen to his lies ANYMORE. Africa is on the rise again. Black Power, Forward Africa.