Skip to content


King Tut DNA 99.6% Western European

King Tut

Recently-leaked DNA test results prove ancient Egyptian royal Pharaoh Tutankhamen, aka King Tut, is 99.6% Western European.

The results were mistakenly leaked in the American cable television show Royal Blood: King Tut Unwrapped. The tests were conducted to find out if a newly-discovered mummy was the boy king’s father.

The Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, had previously stated that he would never reveal the DNA results of King Tut, whose racial make-up has been a source of dispute for many.

The above video shows a series of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), repeated DNA sequences whose characteristics are used to identify humans.

European Distribution of the R1b haplogroup

Racial historian Arthur Kemp took the above STR results and put them into a Haplogroup Predictor created by retired physicist and professor Whit Athey. The resulting haplogroup, which gives insight into the ancestral background of an individual going back thousands of years, came back with a 99.6% match with the R1b haplogroup.

The R1b haplogroup “is the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup in Europe reaching its highest concentrations in Ireland, Scotland, western England and the European Atlantic seaboard — in other words, European through and through,” writes Kemp.

Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in Solutrean Truth.

Tagged with , , , , .


123 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. dreamhunk says

    When the Moors (Muslims) Ruled Europe: Documentary (full)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM8HnvuKbAo

    another great video on the moors

  2. HeruTutankhamen says

    This type of DNA is well known throughout Sub Sahara Africa and Northern Africa. King Tut has an elongated skull which is well known throughout Africa especially Sub Sahara Africa even Namibia. The Egyptian Empire was all over in Europe during the 12th Dynasty which includes Russia and several other dynasties before King Tut was around was over in Spain. Also they reached India aka Hindu Kush. Basically Zahi Hawass and the European Jews are masking his DNA all for money and exploitation because they know white people would not attend the museums if they knew King Tut was black. King Tut was black, you could not take the throne during his time period if you were not black. The Egyptians kept their bloodline in tact. This is as bad as painting a picture of a white Yeshua aka Jesus. He was black too.

    • victor says

      Jajajaja, very funny!

    • Nofretete says

      Nor King Tut was black, nor Jesus. How do you define black?
      They were both Caucasians. And for the record, there was never black people in Egypt in the whole history. Please review your information!

      • fidel says

        its very clear that nofretete and victor dnt know anything – king tut was from egypt, the Egyptians where from one of the sons of ham who was blood brothers to ethopians, the sudanise (cushites), canaanites. Now if these were black where do u get a white king tut? Nofrete – egypt was a black nation and guess what its found in africa! You actually need to review ur info and maybe pick up ur bible and read that in genesis 10. Now for those who say the messiah was white – the hebrews looked exactly like the black egyptians – u couldnt tell them apart. Fast forward to NT- why would the centurian ask Paul if he wasnt “that egyptian” when he was surprised he spoke roman? Why would “jesus” go hide in Africa when herod was after him? Come on now the clues are all over, if u want to know what he looked like look at the original Egyptians not the modern day arab Egyptians who came through and conquered Egypt and are now ruling it.

        • irishnyc says

          how is it so clear? jesus was a sephardic jew-they look similar to arabs, and genetically speaking, are very similar people. (hebrew and arabic are both semetic languages). The orginal people of north Africa werent arabs, but they weren’t black either..they were BERBERS. For the most part, the arabs didnt intermix with the berbers (except for egypt), and countries like morocco, algeria, ect. the dna of the people there today is almost exclusively berber. You my friend, are the one who doesnt know anything. ITs been proven by DNA, by scientists who are a lot smarter than you or I. I’m a very liberal democrat, not racist at all, but I’m sick of people saying Jesus wasn’t white. Granted, he was not a blonde hair blue eyes white like hes often portrayed, but he most certainly wasn’t black. He lived in Israel; part of the present day Middle East. How could you possibly think he was black? Black skinned people originate from SOUTH of the sahara dessert. The ancient kingdom of egypt was large, and its souther reaches stretched past the dessert into present day Sudan. There was cultural and social diffusion, and elements of the culures of the lighter skinned egyptians and the people they conquered mixed together. But, as these article clearly states, KING TUT WAS 96% WHITE. Yeah, traces of his dominant DNA halotype are found south of the sahara, but the DNA a white, western trait, orginating in WESTERN EUROPE. any traces of it found in sub saharan africa originated from a white ancestor..the logic in your argument is flawed. I’m sorry your black power professor/pastor,(whoever gave you your bogus info) misled you.

  3. Buddhata says

    Shekem Tutankhamen was certainly “black”. However Yeshua Ben Pandira (Jesus of Nazareth) was “white”. It is said that Yehoshua’s physical father was a Roman soldier and that his mother Mary was Jewish. It seems to me that the Jews were mostly Caucasian (partly descended from the Hyksos) and that the Khemetians were for the most part Black Africans.

    • Nofretete says

      King Tut was not black. How do you define black?
      He was Caucasians like all the Egyptians. And for the record, there was never black people in Egypt in the whole history. Please review your information!

  4. t says

    yeah right

  5. MEME says

    I call BULLSHIT on this.

1 2 3

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Raynne linked to this post on June 8, 2010

    RT @TopsyRT: King Tut DNA 99.6% Western European http://is.gd/cF21L

  2. Christian linked to this post on June 8, 2010

    King Tut DNA 99.6% Western European http://is.gd/cF21L

  3. Jennifer Bridges linked to this post on August 27, 2010

    RT @TopsyRT: King Tut DNA 99.6% Western European http://is.gd/cF21L

  4. Eine wunderbare Rasse – Teil 1 « Der Honigmann sagt… linked to this post on November 19, 2012

    [...] gekannt hast. Wusstest du, dass ein im Jahr 2011 durchgeführter DNS-Test ergeben hat, dass der ägyptische König Tut gemeinsame Vorfahren mit 70% der britischen Männer und mit 50% aller europä…  Merkwürdigerweise gibt es KEINE vergleichbare DNS-Übereinstimmung zwischen den heutigen [...]

You must be logged in to post a comment.