Young Obama with Grandma Sarah
Barack Obama’s grandmother Sarah, identified by the Associated Press as being Christian during the presidential campaign, has arrived in Mecca to participate in the Hajj, a holy pilgrmage undertaken by Muslims at least once in their lives.
Sarah, 87, is being accompanied by a nephew and Obama’s cousin, Omran.
The Saudi daily Okaz reports Sarah was seen in the valley of Mina with an African delegation.
It is unknown why a Christian woman would embark on a Muslim pilgrimage.
Related posts:
And this is what’s running this country today. He’s in charge of our foreign policy, the military, the domestic agenda, and the federal courts.
@ RightIsWrong:
Let's see you get your flabby ass over there to Afghanistan, or your children! Hmmmm, not so brave now, are you? Thought so!
And "Mohammedans won’t kill other mohammedans"? Tell that to the Sunni and Shia in Iraq, dumbass!
I don’t know what the voters expected from an antiwhite mohammedan. He wants to send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. What a joke. If he were really interested in defeating those scumbags with the filthy towels around their heads, he’d be deploying 300,000 troops there and maybe just as many more into Iraq so we can finish off those ungrateful bastards as well already (and don’t even get me started about Iran!).
Mohammedans won’t kill other mohammedans.
RightIsRight,
You're correct in how you feel. However, we shouldn't send any more troops…we should use tactical nuclear weapons on them and save our blood and treasure. They've shown the world during the last 1,400 years that they are incapable of being civilized and living in peace with anyone who isn't a muslim.
It's also true about what Nim says regarding the Sunnis and Shia killing each other, BUT, that's more along the lines of tribal differences and tribal conflicts. However, you are 100% correct in your statement about muslims not killing each other in regards to their religion and their jhad aganst the infidel. It is written in the qu 'ran that muslims shall not kill other muslims unless muslims betray their faith. They are also instructed to join together and kill ONLY the infidel in pursuit of their agenda of turning the world into an islamic caliphate.
There are also other exceptions when it is OK to kill other muslims BUT ONLY if it advances their agenda of islamic world domination.
What a lovely bunch of lunatics.
Nim Liar, compare the number of mohammedans killed at the hands of other mohammedans to the number of innocent Israeli schoolchildren who have been blown up by suicide bombers in Israel. Maybe it's just because I value higher forms of life such as Jews much more than you who love subhuman vermin with filthy towels wrapped around their heads.
Ron, the use of nukes would run the risk of blowing back into Israel. We're supposed to be their friends and allies. Making their capital city of Jerusalem glow wouldn't be very friendly or ally like of us.
We've already liberated the Iraqis who are ungrateful as hell so my first inclination would be to just slaughter all of them and let God sort it out but then that would defeat the good work we've already done there. In order to make them (the insurgents really) see the error of their ways will take more manpower just as it will in Iran.
We could probably up the infantry to 300,000 more troops in Iraq (and I would love for Nim Liar to be among them first in line with a target painted on his fatigues, lol) but in order to also do what we need to do to Ahmadinejad would require at least a half million more Iran being a larger country. Add to that what it will take to subdue Afghanistan and finally flush out bin Laden and you're talking about serious troop strength here.
In order to accomplish all of this Obama will need to reinstate the Draft. I know that's not popular these days but Iran has already pledged to wipe out Israel AND the U.S. so there doesn't seem to be any alternative. And if Putti-Putin gives us any shit about this like he did over Ossetia/Georgia then we need to have enough manpower to slap his faggy candy ass along with Moscow down too.
Like Frank has said, "I don't care if they hate us, I just want them to FEAR us". And you better believe they do. Let's make sure of it!
RightIsRight,
In my post, noice that I said that we should use "TACTICAL" nuclear weapons in Afghanistan. Not "strategic" nuclear weapons. There is a BIG difefrence between the two.
Tactical nukes are used on the battlefield. They are low-yield nukes that do not wipe out entire populations as do strategic nukes. Tactical weapons include gravity bombs, short-range missiles, artillery shells, land mines, depth charges, and torpedoes for anti-submarine warfare, with nuclear warheads. Also in this category were the former nuclear-warheaded surface-to-air missiles, and air-to-air missiles.
With these low-yield weapons, Israel will not be affected in any way.
BTW, John McCain sponsored a broad amnesty bill for illegal aliens in the summer of 2007 and it was RESOUNDINGLY defeated by ordinary Americans at the grass roots level. His candiacy for president was on life support at that point, only to be resurrected by the Liberal/Marxist media because they knew he would be the weakest candidate to oppose even Hillary Clinton. McCain has ALWAYS been a pro-amnesty proponent. He's a brain-dead Liberal Republican. He is NO Conservative. He even voted AGAINST the Bush tax cuts. That's why he was the darling of the media. He's a BUM!
BTW, G.W. Bush ALSO supported that amnesty bill as did the Democraps.
@rightisRight & Ron:
GRrrr Ruff!Ruff!
YAP!Yap!Yap! yip.
Grrrr….
Ron, low yield nukes still run the possibility of permanently making the soil glow where they're used. Iran is rich in natural resources which Israel may wish to use and even share with the U.S.. Israeli settlements could possibly be built there too in the future so it makes no sense to attempt to destroy the geography. Besides, even low level nukes can produce fallout which under the right conditions could still be blown over and around Israel thus endangering her population. I KNOW you don't want to see that happen. No, Israel's freedom and our freedom fully depends upon Obama reinstating the Draft and allowing us to send several million troops to the middle east to finish our enemies off once and for all. If we're going to do it let's do it right.
And as for McCain, the drive-by media didn't pick him as the GOP candidate. The Republicans had the wisdom to do that because he was obviously the strongest candidate, though others such as the great Rudy Giuliani would have served the same purpose almost as well. John McCain is a war hero who spent several years being imprisoned by the Vietnamese and he survived. He is a genuine American hero and patriot who showed that he is a strong man who could lead a nation in wartime. Though I laughed hard when I saw the video of McCain singing, "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran", I also had to cheer because I knew then and there that this is a man with guts who could lead the U.S. into complete victory over ALL of our foes in the Middle East and the rest of the world.
About immigration you're wrong: Republicans have always been at the forefront of limiting and reforming immigration. Do you think we would've had illegal aliens crashing our borders while the great Ronald Wilson Reagan was in office? Hell no. Republicans protect our borders as George W. did. It's the democraps like Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter and Obama who open our borders to foreign invaders.