Skip to content


Jury Biased For Sliwa?

Sliwa gloats after win.

Sliwa gloats after win.

The behavior of a juror in the libel trial of Curtis Sliwa indicates the jury may have been biased in favor of the Guardian Angels founder and ruled in his favor.

“We sat down,” 43-year-old juror Jacqueline Lopez told The New York Post.  “We all said at one shot, ‘No.’ ”

After taking only minutes to decide Sliwa did not libel Brooklyn imam Siraj Wahhaj by saying he was running guns into Canada, The NY Post reports that Lopez asked Sliwa for a hug and said, “I love you guys,” a reference to the Guardian Angels.

During the two-day trial, Sliwa testified that he once respected the imam but that changed after Wahhaj loudly supported the 1993 WTC bombing mastermind Omar Abdel Rahman, known as the “Blind Sheik,” during his trial.

While Wahhaj became known as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the case, speculation indicates that he was in fact working for Federal agents.

Sliwa characteristically was a sore winner outside the courthouse after his legal win. “The Gottis tried to kill me twice and it never shut me up,” he gloated.

Wahhaj soberly accepted the verdict. “I respect the process,” he said. “I disagree with the outcome. I’m not mad at anybody. I’m not upset.”

Related posts:

  1. Sliwa Sued For Slander…. Again
  2. The Video Curtis Sliwa Does Not Want You To See!
  3. Sliwa Eyes Hartford
  4. Guardian Angels “A Paramilitary Organization”: Sliwa
  5. Sliwa Loses In Halifax

Posted in The Sleeze-wah Files.

Tagged with , , , .


14 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Philoctetes says

    Tell me this slithering toad isn’t blessed somehow!! How the fuck does he do it?

  2. ron says

    No matter how detestable Sliwa is, I’m glad that this other militant muslim, enemy-of-America lost his frivolous lawsuit against him. The NY Post article went into further detail and said that this imam (unindicted co-conspirator for the 1993 WTC attack) approached Sliwa long agao and asked how the imam and his muslim gang could patrol the streets unarmed, Well, it turns out that the muslim vigilante group DID, in fact, carry guns, and some of them told Sliwa that its members took their guns to Canada for “vacation”.

    If this militant muslim prevailed against Sliwa, who knows what that militant imam would’ve done with that money.

    Score another victory for America against the muslims who want to destroy it.

  3. The Great Frank says

    Perhaps he bribed a juror the way that Gotti Jr. his arch nemisis is accused of. This had nothing to do with the Mohamadanist’s politics, but a slimy degenerate liar and media shyster who is always attacking other’s character. He was sued by “Mob Candy” magazine for the same charges:slander. We haven’t heard about this case. Notice he never talks about either case. This will only inflate his ego, and there will be other cases until he is brought down to earth. He has been milking the Gotti case,, when in fact no one cares about it except this degenerate liar and media shyster. He says nightly that “the mob tried twice to killl me”. That is of course another degenerate lie, from a degenerate liar and media shyster. The court transcripts show that they had no intent of killing him! One day, there shall be justice!!

  4. Philoctetes says

    Maybe the brothers and the greaseballs can get together and take this polock out.

  5. The NIM Truth says

    This was a stupid show trial, much like when Frank and John’s good friend Hal Turner had a show trial with some old spic who claimed he was assaulted by Hal.

  6. rjjrdq says

    If I have to choose between Sliwa and a dubious imam, I’m going with Sliwa everytime and twice on Tuesday.

  7. Fuck Ron says

    Ron,

    Mind providing a single thread of evidence that this imam is “militant muslim, enemy-of-America” you fucking piece of shit! Assholes like you only eat shit so you talk a lot of shit.

  8. ron says

    “Mind providing a single thread of evidence that this imam is “militant muslim, enemy-of-America” you fucking piece of shit! Assholes like you only eat shit so you talk a lot of shit.”

    It’s apparent that I hit a nerve with one of the imam’s mindless, brain-dead followers. The animal who posted that rant is just pissed-off that his America-hating imam lost his case against Sliwa.

    As for this moron’s challenge to me to provide a “single thread of evidence” that his imam is a militant enemy of America, well, I already did so in my original post….his imam was an UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATOR IN THE 1993 WTC BOMBING. Perhaps this devil-worshipping scumbag should take remedial reading classes at the local public school in his Brooklyn slum.

    BTW, the brain-dead muslim who posted his rant is your typical, angry, white-hating BLACK MAN who fill those masjids in Brooklyn. His rant is full of anger and hate. Poor bastard…it’s obvious islam is having an effect on the only two brain cells he has left in his head.

  9. The Great Frank says

    Sliwa tried to have a decorated Vietnam veteran fired from his job, claiming that Sliwa was threatened by him. He said in a letter signed by him and John Mannelli, the program director at WABC at the time, that he was sent faxes by him. He contacted the man’s employer where the faxes CRITICAL of Sliwa were sent from. The degenerate liar and fag Manelli said that they’d produce the faxes. NONE WERE EVER PRODUCED as they didn’t exist! This is the degenerate liar and media shyster and low life cocksucker that Sliwa is. The veteran should have SUED Sliwa, Mannelli and WABC for slander! No one is lower than this degenerate liar and media shyster!

  10. The NIM Truth says

    @Great Frank

    Who was this "decorated Vietnam veteran" you keep talking about?

  11. Felix Paladin says

    Sooner or Later this Degenerate Liar’s words will put him in the poor house!!! Two lawsuits this year so far and more to come. You can bet on it!!!!

  12. The Great Frank says

    Ask Sliwa.

  13. Philoctetes says

    @Frank: Are you sexually attracted to Curtis Sliwa?

Continuing the Discussion

  1. N.I.M. Busters linked to this post on October 10, 2009

    #tcot Jury Biased For Sliwa? – The behavior of a juror in the libel trial of Curtis Sliwa indicates the jury may ha… http://ow.ly/15U7Ml

You must be logged in to post a comment.