<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Death Panel&#8221; Already Exists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/18/death-panel-already-exists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/18/death-panel-already-exists/</link>
	<description>NYC's Most Dangerous Callers to Talk Radio give The RIGHT Perspective on their own show!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Organ Harvesting Without Consent</title>
		<link>http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/18/death-panel-already-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-20866</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Organ Harvesting Without Consent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightperspective.org/?p=6153#comment-20866</guid>
		<description>[...] will play a major role in defining the government’s role in controlling medical care. In 2003 he wrote a paper for the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies arguing that human life varies in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will play a major role in defining the government’s role in controlling medical care. In 2003 he wrote a paper for the AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies arguing that human life varies in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/18/death-panel-already-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-12850</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightperspective.org/?p=6153#comment-12850</guid>
		<description>Death Panels came into existence with the HMO revolution started during the Nixon Administration.  Insurance companies panels (board of directors) have denied many of their insured vital health services in order to increase their profits.  People have died as a result of not receiving needed care.  It was recently reported that the CEO of United Healthcare &quot;earns&quot; $100000.00 an hour in compensation.  After paying off the executives and providing some crumbs for the stockholders, how much is left to actually pay for the care and treatment of the insured.

The whole healthcare system needs a complete overhaul.  Healthcare has become more and more unobtainable due to the cost of expensive treatments and modalities.  Drug companies and others that sell healthcare products are the ones that pay for research and developing new treatments to bring to market.  As corporations, they are interested in the MOST PROFITABLE treatments and not the most effective treatments.  Furthermore, these companies make billions on selling products that treat disease and would end up going bankrupt if cures were actually discovered.  What would happen to Eli Lily if diabetes was cured?  They would go under.  Do you think Eli Lily is interested in finding a cure that would put them out of business? Of course not.  Too much money in insulin, infusion pumps, glucometers and strips, etc.

Insurance companies also are in it for the money.  They contract with doctors to pay them highly discounted and reduced fees and they are taking higher and higher premiums from their insured to basically transfer the discounted rates to their insured.  With higher deductibles and co-pays, the insurance company hardly has to pay out anything.  For example, an insurance company will pay a maximum of $40 as a per diem for therapy regardless of how many therapies are done.  The doctor will get $40 dollars no matter what he does.  If the insured has a $40 co-pay which is quite common, then the insurance company doesn&#039;t have to pay a penny.  The insured pays the doctor directly.

Money needs to be spent on independent research to discover and bring to the public the most effective and least costly treatments in order to get the costs under control.  We rely way to heavily on private corporations to do this research which leads to more and more expensive treatments.  Research is extremely expensive but well worth it in order to contain health costs.

The general public should be afforded the same health care discounts that are negotiated by insurance companies with doctors and hospitals.  The government can negotiate a fair price and it does not have to be made mandatory.  However, if docs are willing to provide care at these discounted rates already, I would be surprised if they chose not to participate in this plan.  I am sure that plenty will.

The government should start or encourage non-profit or co-op insurance companies to compete with the existing companies.  This should also go a long way in knocking down costs.  CEOs of insurance companies should not be making hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation while hard working people are being denied even basic healthcare.

There is no question that any attempt to provide good healthcare for everyone in our great nation within the existing framework will be so prohibitively expensive as to either bankrupt this country, deny health services based on subjectively based criteria (so called death panels) or both.  Fundamental change is required or this nightmare will never end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death Panels came into existence with the HMO revolution started during the Nixon Administration.  Insurance companies panels (board of directors) have denied many of their insured vital health services in order to increase their profits.  People have died as a result of not receiving needed care.  It was recently reported that the CEO of United Healthcare &#8220;earns&#8221; $100000.00 an hour in compensation.  After paying off the executives and providing some crumbs for the stockholders, how much is left to actually pay for the care and treatment of the insured.</p>
<p>The whole healthcare system needs a complete overhaul.  Healthcare has become more and more unobtainable due to the cost of expensive treatments and modalities.  Drug companies and others that sell healthcare products are the ones that pay for research and developing new treatments to bring to market.  As corporations, they are interested in the MOST PROFITABLE treatments and not the most effective treatments.  Furthermore, these companies make billions on selling products that treat disease and would end up going bankrupt if cures were actually discovered.  What would happen to Eli Lily if diabetes was cured?  They would go under.  Do you think Eli Lily is interested in finding a cure that would put them out of business? Of course not.  Too much money in insulin, infusion pumps, glucometers and strips, etc.</p>
<p>Insurance companies also are in it for the money.  They contract with doctors to pay them highly discounted and reduced fees and they are taking higher and higher premiums from their insured to basically transfer the discounted rates to their insured.  With higher deductibles and co-pays, the insurance company hardly has to pay out anything.  For example, an insurance company will pay a maximum of $40 as a per diem for therapy regardless of how many therapies are done.  The doctor will get $40 dollars no matter what he does.  If the insured has a $40 co-pay which is quite common, then the insurance company doesn&#8217;t have to pay a penny.  The insured pays the doctor directly.</p>
<p>Money needs to be spent on independent research to discover and bring to the public the most effective and least costly treatments in order to get the costs under control.  We rely way to heavily on private corporations to do this research which leads to more and more expensive treatments.  Research is extremely expensive but well worth it in order to contain health costs.</p>
<p>The general public should be afforded the same health care discounts that are negotiated by insurance companies with doctors and hospitals.  The government can negotiate a fair price and it does not have to be made mandatory.  However, if docs are willing to provide care at these discounted rates already, I would be surprised if they chose not to participate in this plan.  I am sure that plenty will.</p>
<p>The government should start or encourage non-profit or co-op insurance companies to compete with the existing companies.  This should also go a long way in knocking down costs.  CEOs of insurance companies should not be making hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation while hard working people are being denied even basic healthcare.</p>
<p>There is no question that any attempt to provide good healthcare for everyone in our great nation within the existing framework will be so prohibitively expensive as to either bankrupt this country, deny health services based on subjectively based criteria (so called death panels) or both.  Fundamental change is required or this nightmare will never end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Damonas</title>
		<link>http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/18/death-panel-already-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-12682</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Damonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightperspective.org/?p=6153#comment-12682</guid>
		<description>Comparative Effectiveness Research works like this:  If a bureaucrat doesn&#039;t want 70 year olds to have total knee replacements, they compare total knee replacement to sitting in a wheelchair and taking pain pills.  They find equal life-expectancies, so they are deemed equivalent treatments, and  the cheaper (wheelchair/narcotics) is the new standard for 70 year olds.  Easy, no?  If I were a 70 year old who voted for Obama, I&#039;d be having serious voter&#039;s remorse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparative Effectiveness Research works like this:  If a bureaucrat doesn&#8217;t want 70 year olds to have total knee replacements, they compare total knee replacement to sitting in a wheelchair and taking pain pills.  They find equal life-expectancies, so they are deemed equivalent treatments, and  the cheaper (wheelchair/narcotics) is the new standard for 70 year olds.  Easy, no?  If I were a 70 year old who voted for Obama, I&#8217;d be having serious voter&#8217;s remorse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
