When you listen to talk radio, you will notice how the hosts pick up on a phrase and use it until it becomes a cliche.
They know nothing about the background of the phrase, and if they do express an understanding of it, it is totally wrong. But they they continue saying it, because they are being paid millions to do it and their staff writers tell them what to think. So, they get on and they spout cliches.
And the cliche they are using is, “Islamo-fascism.”
They were throwing that term out left and right over the last eight years, but you don’t really hear that term so much anymore. Maybe they got their marching orders to not use it. Such as how Obama stopped using “The War on Terror” or how the Ministry of Lies does not use the term, “terrorist.” Now, we are fighting “militants” in Afghanistan. No, they’re murdering bastards, they are terrorists, they are killers and homicidal maniacs. They are not, in any shape or form, “militants.”
It’s also like that with Al Sharpton. The Ministry of Lies refers to him as a “militant.” No he’s not a “militant,” he’s a “racist of colour.” But if you’re White, then of course you are a “racist.”
In this way we can see the terms are used any way they want.
But when they use the term “Islamo-fascist” they really have no conception of that term. Because, first of all, it was the anti-Communists in the 1930’s who were admirers of Mohammedanism. The real term is, “Islamo-Bolsheviki,” but the actual connection between fascism and Mohammedanism is something that, historically, none of these idiots could even conceive of.
For example, in the book, Franco and Hitler: Spain, Germany and World War II by Stanley G. Pane, Hitler hated the Catholic Church. He knew nothing of Spanish culture and was unaware that Spain’s Golden Age had ever existed. Hitler particularly detested The Catholic Church and that’s why, when Germany had invaded Poland, Franco and his supporters were extremely angry because it was a fellow Catholic country.
Pane writes, “Conversely, Hitler considered Islam, with its simple theology and ethos of Holy War [i.e., Jihad], the best of the Holy religions. He believed that the highest culture ever seen in Spain was that of the Mohammedans, since it was so refreshingly non-Christian and later lamented that the Mohammedan expansion had been checked in France. Hitler conjured, had the Germans been converted to Mohammedanism, rather than to decadent, love-oriented Christianity, they might have already conquered the world in the Middle Ages.”
So you see, when they use the term, “Islamo-fascism,” they really don’t understand it. There was a fascination with Mohammedanism in the 1930’s by anti-Communists. When Il Duce conquered Libya and waved the famous “Sword of Islam,” the fact is, the sword is violence, the sword the symbol of Mohammedanism, because Mohammad said, “by the sword I shall convert.” And in the higher intellectual circles of fascista Italy, there were those who converted Mohammedanism. They admired the militancy of Mohammedanism. They admired Jihad. They admired the fact that it is not a religion of forgiveness, but rather a religion of super-cession, where it can only exist and there can be no other religion to compete with it.
Franco himself believed in Iberio-Africanism. That is, Spain, because of it 800-year connection to Mohammedanism, was interchangeable with Morocco and North Africa and did not hate Mohammedanism.
So, you see, when talk radio hosts use that term, “Islamo-fascism,” they are using it totally out of context and have no idea of its true origins. The proper term should be “Mohamed-Bolshevism” because it was Churchill who compared Bolshevism to Mohammedanism in 1913. Churchill said, “it is as fanatical in its belief as Mohammedanism.”
So the correct term is “Islamo-Bolshevism.”
Thank you!
More from TRP
- Underpants Bomber Would Not Have Blown Up Plane
- ANC Defends “Kill The Boer” Song
- 48% Of Black Women Have Herpes: CDC
TRP Recommends
- Greek Prime Minister: Traders are Conspiring Against Us (The Wall Street Journal)
- Readers speak out on boorish theater behavior column (Denver Post News)
- A Perfectly Framed Assassination (The Wall Street Journal)
![Recommend [therightperspective]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/logo-recommend-us.png){kind=logo}
Related posts:
Ironically, the MEK, a terrorist group that has received US funding in Iran, is perhaps the only example of an “Islamo-Marxist” group that exists today.
Did you notice how the Jews use the term “Fascist” as a curse? Do you remember how NYS Attorney General Robert Abrams got in trouble in calling that term to Sen. Al Damato? Jewsshow their ignorance once again. The only real friends the Jews had in Europe were the fascists. Mussolini wasn’t antisemitic and it was not until the fall of the Italian fascists and the de facto takeover of Italy by the Nazis that the Jews of Italy were deported to Nazi concentration camps. Franco was not antisemitic even though he did get attacked by those Lower Easr Side Jew pricks of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Franco owed Hitler because Franco allowed Hitler to bomb those Basque pricks in Guernica. Even so, Franco would not let even one Spanish Jew get deported to Germany. More so, Portugal under Fascist Salazar send emmisaries to France to give French Jews travel documents to travel through Spain and reside in Portugal for the duration of the war. So when you hear a knis eater say you are a fascist, tell him, “Lech le genenom, yimach shmo vezichro, shem reshaim yirkav” and “Geh coken offen yom”!!
“Edmond Dantes” is another ETB/Schwartz/Alley Oop sockpuppet.
-Admin.
Churchill may have likened the fanaticism of Bolsheviks to that of the Muslims, but it it important to note that he did not characterize Bolshevism as a Mohammedan movement:
FTA: ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, February 8, 1920
http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/05/jewish-peril-1933-versus-2009.html
Zionism versus Bolshevism.
A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People
By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.
“…The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.
…There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”
Ironically, Churchill himself was of Jewish extraction although he was not a practicing Jew and it is unclear whether he ever identified as a Jew. Both Patrick J. Buchanan and David Irving have written on this topic.
This view of Bolshevism was corroborated even by National Geographic. On page 314 of this article NG describes the identity of the Bolsheviks in similar terms: http://www.geocities.com/revolution_in_russia/
Sadly the materialist narrative of history that is touted today tends to gloss over ethno-religious component in history. It over-emphasizes class struggle and takes at face value the claim that revolutionaries were motivated solely by materialist/class-related ambitions.
Jews felt threatened by the nationalist movements of the 19th century. Bolshevism, which emphasized class struggle, and Zionism, which promoted Jewish nationalism and self-determination were touted as an alternative to the indigenous European nationalist movements as these movements were considered to be hostile to Jewish ethnic interests.
Ironically, the MEK, a terrorist group that has received US funding in Iran, is perhaps the only example of an “Islamo-Marxist” group that exists today.
Pan Arab nationalism was in fact a secular socialist movement which fused Arab nationalism with secular socialism. Nasser, Hussein, and Qaddafi are archetypal examples of pan-Arab nationalists.
But theirs is a deracinated Islam and a near fanatical secularism. Hussein for example would cut the electricity supply to any Shia home that refused to send its daughters to school. They were also fanatical egalitarians who enacted strict quotas that a minimum of 40% of the university professors be women. Similarly, the NYTimes reports that Qaddafi’s Libya has the most equitable distribution of wealth in Africa.
Political Islamism – as embodied by the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, or even Hamas – is largely a reaction to the secular socialism which was once seen as an indigenous modernizing force in in the Arab world.
Sounds to me we’re all playing with words here so let me confuse the issue even more. For me Zionism = Bolshevism (the mother of Communism and Fascism). The former being ‘International Socialism’ and the latter ‘National Socialism’ – Period.