Skip to content


Obama “Natural Born” Goes SCOTUS Round 3

It seems that Phil Berg may finally get his day in court.

The Democrat activist lawyer, who was the first to bring forth a legal challenge to US-president elect Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold office based on his “natural born” status, is scheduled to have the US Supreme Court discuss the merits of the suit on January 9, 2009.

Berg originally brought his suit to the Supreme Court in October. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari and an application for injunction of the election; the injunction was rejected by Judge David Souter’s Clerk. The case has been in legal limbo ever since.

Berg’s case marks the third time the US Supreme Court will argue the merts of a “natural born” lawsuit. The two previous cases, filed by New Jersey resident Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski. were both rejected.

“I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of the United States,” Berg wrote in a statement on his Obamacrimes.com website.

The “natural born” status of president-elect Obama remains in question. Berg contends Obama was adopted by his step-father while living in Indonesia, thus removing his “natural born” status. An audio recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother admitting Obama was born in Kenya has surfaced. Additionally, Obama’s own “Fight The Smears” website said Obama was a Kenyan citizen until 1982.

Hawaii governor Linda Lingle, a Republican, has sealed Obama’s birth certificate from public access. A member of Obama’s election campaign dismissed the lawsuits as “pure garbage“.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. SCOTUS Rejects Obama “Natural Born” Lawsuit
  2. SCOTUS To Discuss Obama “Natural Born” Lawsuit
  3. Obama “Natural Born Citizen” Suit Headed For Supreme Court
  4. Ohio “Natural Born” Obama Suit Thrown Out
  5. Is Obama A Natural Born Citizen? Update

Posted in Defeat Obama Central.

Tagged with , , , , , .


145 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. John says

    As to the Ted Kennedy comment a few posts back, How does he feel now? How do I put this? Let’s see, Teddy endorsed BHO. BHO’s best friend is Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers wrote an anarchists book and dedicated it to Sirhan Sirhan. If your too young to remember, Sirhan Sirhan killed Teddy’s brother. Poor Teddy was duped, just as we have been duped. Shame on us.

  2. MaineSkeptic says

    Hmm, John, I think the “BHO’s best friend is Bill Ayers” link needs a little work, but keep at it, you’ll have your own blog in no time.

  3. richCares says

    “Do you have some inside information, or is this just another uninformed delusion by an Obama Hypnobot ? I suspect the latter.Emi”

    there were 3 “denieds” so far & 4th one coming, so I will give you my deluded answer to you on Jan 12 (hint check Scalia)
    to keep refilling and expecting different answer is the real delusion! I will laugh at you on Jan 12th 10:00AM
    here’s link to SCOTUS
    http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

    note I got same type of reply as yours on Wrotnowski case, who was deluded? look at that one:
    http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

    only deluded one is you

  4. vma224 says

    “Not hearing the case now, only puts us deeper in crisis!”
    only a crisis in a deluded wingnut mind.

    World Net Daily (in the forefront of being anti Obama) says the following
    ““A separate WND investigation into Obama’s birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there”

    Link to archived article
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214

    continue your stillness, but watch congress validate the Electoral voles on Jan 6, then watch the Inauguration on Jan 20 with most Americans cheering!
    Oh, on Jan 12, check SCOTUS site for Berg denial!

  5. MaineSkeptic says

    See that! It’s been the passport all along! And those tinfoil loons have been distracting us with the phony birth certificate issue…it’s a good thing BHO didn’t spend the $12 on the real BC, it just would have been a big waste of money!

  6. John says

    Manic,
    BHO and Bill Ayers ties are well documented and frankly shocking. BHO’s characterization of “just a guy in the neighborhood” is nothing short of laughable.
    I don’t want to be short, if there are BHO supporters that have not done their homework on Ayers, BHO and their wives’ and lives in Chicago and the Columbia University connection, please educate yourselves.
    How do you think BHO got his start in the cesspool politics of Chicago?
    Just laughable!

  7. richCares says

    “Do you have some inside information, or is this just another uninformed delusion by an Obama Hypnobot ? I suspect the latter.Emi”

    with 3 denieds so far and 4th one on the way, what will happen at conference, Mystery huh! (hint check Scaila’s “denieds” on the other cases) Expecting other than a “denied” is delusional!

    it will be fun to laugh at you on Jan 12 10:00 am, when you find out how deluded I am
    http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

    I will send you Berg “denied” order on Jan 12th around 11 AM
    for other cases go to SCOTUS site and search for Berg, Donfrio, Wrotnowski, Lightfoot
    then tell me about delusions!

  8. MaineSkeptic says

    Hey, trust me, I’m laughing!

  9. vma224 says

    “BHO and Bill Ayers ties are well documented ”
    hey call the National Guard, Call Gen Jones, call Gen Shinseki, call Gates, they all swore loyalty to Obama, be a patriot and tell them all you know, save the day,boy will they be surprized at this secet stuff you know!

  10. acosta says

    sorry about your grievance John, just practice saying “president Obama”, you can do it, just try, because that’s what will happen on Jan 20, enjoy being left behind!

  11. richCares says

    The Lineup For Obama’s Inauguration
    Musical Selections
    …The San Francisco Boys Chorus and the San Francisco Girls Chorus
    Call To Order And Welcoming Remarks
    …Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Invocation
    …Pastor Rick Warren, Saddleback Church, Lake Forest, Calif.
    Musical Selection
    …Aretha Franklin
    Oath Of Office Administered To Joe Biden
    …John Paul Stevens, associate justice of the Supreme Court
    Musical Selection
    …John Williams, composer/arranger
    …Itzhak Perlman, violin
    …Yo-Yo Ma, cello
    …Gabriela Montero, piano
    …Anthony McGill, clarinet
    Oath Of Office Administered To Barack Obama
    …John G. Roberts, chief justice of the Supreme Court
    Inaugural Address
    …President Obama
    Poem
    …Elizabeth Alexander
    Benediction
    …The Rev. Joseph E. Lowery
    The National Anthem
    …The United States Navy Band “Sea Chanters”

    what a lovely day it will be!

  12. acosta says

    John, here's something you can do, go to World Net Daily site (www.wnd.com) and sign their anti-Obama petition**, join the anti-Obama ranks, there is strength in numbers. They have received bundles in donations (yet no faxes to congress) Good fund raiser, easy to mislead and sucker people, but go ahead sign their petition!

    **after signing on, you will then receive multiple requests for a $10.00 donation so they can fax your name on a petition to congress. That’s a good deal, a 30 cent fax for 10.00, how can you beat that!

  13. John says

    I'm not in any group, I'm a logical thinker trying to connect the dots. History is written and can not be changed. The Berg's of the world started the case and it has now evolved beyond the original complaint that BHO is not "natural born". It has evolved to the historical fact that he is not a U.S. Citizen. In order for BHO to prove he is a citizen, he needs to produce his records. The INS Department can force those records or lack thereof to be produced. Again, this has evolved beyond the original question. The evolution was based on BHO's writings and history at the time.

    If you own a business today you are required to prove your employee is a citizen, if you fail to do that, the government will fine you. Instead of the employee bringing proof to the employer from INS, the employer is put in a position of, instead of making widgets becoming an INS investigator or find himself in jail and out of business! Our system is broken and people like BHO knows it and is taking full advantage of it! This is my last post.

  14. MaineSkeptic says

    John — forgive me, I had to go to sleep, and I missed a lot of it. Let me jump on a couple of things:

    o "there is no doubt in your mind that BHO’s citizenship is beyond question?" I wouldn't say there's *no* doubt, because we are only human and can be wrong. But in order to prevent chaos in this country, we have legal systems for determining the truth in a civil, orderly manner. The way I see this, Obama's COLB is proof that he was born in Hawaii, but it is "rebuttable" proof, which means someone else has the right to come along and offer contrary evidence. None of the offers I've seen have been even remotely convincing, so in my mind there is no *reasonable* doubt.

    o "I do know that BHO has locked all of his record, that is even reported in the Main STREAM Media." No, that's a good example of something you think you know that you don't know. We know that a lot of Obama's records are unavailable to the public, and that is true of all citizens. (The State of Hawaii made a statement recently that his records have been treated no differently from anyone else's.) If you want to be sure of getting to the truth, please check your sources carefully. I don't think there's any real confirmation that he's taken any action to lock his records — or, for that matter, that he's spent money on lawyers fighting these cases. I won't believe it till I see credible confirmation, not just endless repetition of internet rumors.

    o "I can’t prove anything unless the records are released." This is the key. Your argument runs, "I know something is fishy, and you have to show me all the documents I can think of so I can get to the bottom of what it is." John, do you understand why our system is 100% opposed to that way of doing things? I mean, I'm not saying that you're a deluded wingnut bringing nuisance suits, but there might be some of them out there. How would your scheme protect us against them?

    o "I will issue a complaint to INS that BHO is an illegal alien." OK. Well, that's not exactly what I suggested, because I don't think that's your best shot — and even if he's a real citizen, he could fail to be a "Natural Born Citizen," and you would still get your wish.

    So let me give you a more specific suggestion:

    Obama's evidence is the Certification of Live Birth, which is an official-looking document which says he was born in Hawaii. If it's a valid document, he is (*almost certainly!*)

    a Natural Born Citizen, If it's not valid, Obama is perpetrating fraud for using it.

    (I say "almost" because the Donofrio/Wrotnowski line of cases assumes that he was born in Hawaii and is still not a NBC. But I don't recommend that approach — the Supreme Court has never found a native-born person not to be a NBC, and most legal observers take a dim view of these cases.)

    Study Berg's evidence that the document is fraudulent — study it hard because you want to get this right. See if you find any of it really convincing. If you do, then figure out where the fraud was committed. If it involves falsifying Hawaii documents, then maybe the Hawaii Attorney General's office is one place to start. If he used false documents to become senator from Illinois, maybe you should try to have charges filed there too. Plus the possibility of federal charges — Patrick Fitzgerald is a tough prosecutor, I'm sure he'd love to know about the evidence if it's something convincing that he could make a case on.

    John, let me be clear. I think you're wrong. I think the chances of your succeeding are as close to zero as they could possibly be. And I'm not a lawyer.

    But I am honestly giving you my best advice. If there is any chance of proving what you're trying to prove, I think I'm pointing you in the right direction.

  15. Johann says

    @richCares

    As an Afrikaner expat living in the UK because a so called "democracy" government came to power in South Africa in 1994 and turned a country into a craphole, I can only say "good luck" with your first "black" president with his African, Muslim, anti-white hate speech and terrorist connections. I won't even go into the corrupt individuals who seem to surround him – yes, yes I know these are all right wing conspiracies.

    Mandela was also called the Messiah when he came to power. Now, only 14 years later, there are only 80 people murdered in South Africa daily and only every 17 seconds is a woman raped. We won't go into the other statistics resulting from a government turning its back on a legal system. Yes, of course Zuma is also innocent of rape and corruption. Just like Mugabe in Zimbabwe. He never exterminated 30,000 people – all conspiracies you know.

    The democrats have already caused the biggest disaster in world financial markets with their leftist liberal political correct ideologies enforced on a financial system during Clinton's term – let's see what they can manage with THEIR Messiah in the next few years!

    Good luck buddy – you're going to need it.

  16. Dan, a concerned nat says

    Folks should not mix up the term CITIZEN with NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, you can be a Citizen of USA but NOT a Natural Born, which is the Constitutional requirement for POTUS. Also, those who allege SCOTUS threw out the cases, are misinformed or believe what they read on blogs or in the newspapers. A check of the SCOTUS Web site shows NO DECISIONS denying ANY of the Petitions for Cert that have been filed by numerous parties. They have denied some requests for injunctive relief, but no decision on the merits or denial of any Pet for Cert has been issued if you take the time to read what the ACTUAL SCOTUS said, instead of reading crap on blogs that misinforms folks. Also those who say Obama is a CONSTITUTIONAL Lawyer, may wish to check the Illinois Supreme Court's Attorney Reg and Disciplinary pages that show that Obama and his wife ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN ILLINOIS. Check yourself, do not believe me, since you read this on a blog! Dan

    See for BHO http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=530661285

    and his wife http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=701953292

  17. Antonio Sosa says

    You are absolutely, right, Johann! Latin Americans who elected Obama-like Marxists (Chavez, Morales, Ortega, Correa) have also seen poverty, corruption and violence multiplied. And they can't even complain about it!

    Why is it that no hospital in Hawaii has records of Obama being born there? Why has Obama spent more than $800,000 on three law firms (and thousands of tax payers’ money) to fight the birth certificate issue rather than just show the certificate that indicates the hospital in which he was born?

    Americans were FOOLED. Almost everything about Obama is FAKE and he may not meet constitutional requirements to be President. The Obama image was manufactured by a very expensive campaign, financed with hundreds of millions of dollars, donated largely by U.S. enemies such as George Soros.

    Brainwashed by the media, Americans became as foolish as the most ignorant Venezuelans, Bolivians and Ecuadorians who believed in CHANGE and YES WE CAN and now see that CHANGE means change toward Marxism, loss of freedom and rights, and greater poverty, despair and corruption. And YES WE CAN means Marxists like Castro, Chavez and Obama CAN fool people

    It seems Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov was right when he warned that, through media manipulation, Americans would be brainwashed and would allow their country to be taken over by Marxists: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlB

    If Obama does not meet Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, the Court must decertify the election. Americans have the right to be protected from Marxists planted by U.S. enemies to destroy us.

  18. Emily says

    richCares, you're awfully cocky for a novice. You see, real professionals are never that cocky.

    1) The cases have not been denied. SCOTUS only denied stopping the election process. They have not ruled on cert or whether or not to hear the issue. They are holding that and remaining MUM which is unusual in my opinion. If they intended clearly to not hear the issue, they would have DENIED WRIT, which they have clearly not yet done. Perhaps they will, but my crystal ball is broke and I can't tell. Maybe you could refer me to the occult store who sold you yours.

    Perhaps your crystal ball could tell me the kind of government and country Obama will turn this country into since he is clearly a marxist communist (or doesn't that ball tell you the past?). And also, perhaps it can tell you why Obama refuses to release any of the normal documents any other presidential nominee has, such as 1) a REAL birth certificate; 2) his admission applications for college; 3) his medical records; 3) his thesis; 4) his selective service registration; and a host of other things that might tell us WHO HE REALLY IS. But of course, you don't really care about that, because you're so hypnotized by his tactics that you can't think anymore. Good luck, FOOL!

  19. Emily says

    OH, AND richCares, maybe you would ask your crystal ball for me, "Why did a court order Michele Obama's law license inactivated?" Yes, a court ordered it. Just wondering. Looks a little suspicious to me that Obama comes from a decades-long well-known political corruption area of the country with which individuals he has excellent standing, plus the fact that not ONE regular guy who has known him well from the past has stepped forward to vouch for his integrity, when all of his associates from the past are communists, socialists, terrorists, and other scumbags who tried to hide in the wings all through the election.

    I once heard a saying that "If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck." Well, this applies to Obama. Only wish he were as harmless as something like a duck. Well, satan, er, Obama, has his hands full with this economy. Let's see what magic he can do without destroying our freedoms (that is if the SCOTUS doesn't quickly grow some gonads to remedy the usurper coming to office).

  20. Emily says

    Ted, please don't get too technical with richCares and the other Obama-Hypnobots in this room. They really can't handle it because they're brains have liquified from lack of use. The technical and factual only tend to irritate them and make them start insulting and calling names.

  21. Emily says

    HEY, WHERE ARE MY POSTS? Don't tell me this site is censoring FACTUAL information about Obama? Shame, shame shame. No wonder we have such an ignorant electorate.

  22. Emily says

    Bill Richardson admitting that Obama is an IMMIGRANT:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5OUdj_YIpo

  23. Emily says

    If you want to find out about Obama's political "roots" go to youtube and do a search for "codeword change" and watch the first 3 videos of the 12-part series. It will enlighten you on what Obama called the best education he ever got.

  24. richCares says

    way too many delusions here, I'm out of here, it's a watse of time trying to discuss this with hatefull people and bigots, but I will make one more appearance, that is to send the Berg "denied" order on Jan 12 to make Emily cry. Othe than that Bye Bye!

  25. Emily says

    MaineSkeptic said on December 21, 2008

    Emily, I understand what you’re saying, but spelling truth with all capital letters doesn’t prove anything, it just makes it look like you’re yelling.

    You know, some people are claiming that Obama is not legally qualified to be president, and that would have to be demonstrated in a court of law. So maybe *you* “don’t care if it’s anything that would help in a legal process,” but those of us who are seriously considering these questions care very much.

    Real evidence is appreciated. Hot air is not.

    ______________________________

    Did you ever think that the caps might just indicate EMPHASIS when there is not an option to underline, italicize, or bold? DUH, yeah, I didn't think so.

    You just don't come to a legal argument by accepting only something that will hold up in court. You assemble ALL truths and then pick from them. They all show a pattern. Facts can become more useful with additionally uncovered information or researched precedent. What in particular did I post that is not "real" evidence? (I'm not talking about Michelle, as that does not apply to Obama except in the "patterns" aspect.) And if you think that is not true, why don't you do your research before you make the mistake of criticizing something you know nothing about.

    You're just being prickly. Get over it.

  26. Emily says

    richCares posted:

    way too many delusions here, I’m out of here, it’s a watse of time trying to discuss this with hatefull people and bigots, but I will make one more appearance, that is to send the Berg “denied” order on Jan 12 to make Emily cry. Othe than that Bye Bye!

    ________________________

    Didn't I tell you? They just can't handle anything truthful or technical without resorting to calling names and running away. A DRIVE-BAY POSTER, perhaps?

    Oh, please, richCares, don't grace us with your presence. We can find the news that you can't, so I'm sure we will find out what happens without you having to tell us. That's right, you're dispensible, and have been dispensed. As for me crying, I cried for America the other day when I went into a huge department store, days before Christmas, where there were NO SHOPPERS, only ONE checkout clerk, and no line. America has suffered more assaults than just Obama. But they all add up to ruin. Now I'm deciding if I want to stay here through the coming really bad times, or move to another country and be more comfortable in my retirement. We'll see. And peanut gallery, please refrain from advice. I don't need it. I'm the one who predicted the inflationary recession/depression back in 1988.

  27. Emily says

    MainSkeptic, that wasn't purported to be fact, that's my OPINION. Perhaps you don't know the difference, a liberal disease symptom.

  28. Emily says

    MainSkeptic, so far you have accused me of not stating any facts but you won't say what things I said that you claim are not factual. Maybe you need to take those burrs out of your boxers.

  29. John says

    Thanks for the new path this case must take. Manic steered me in the right direction. The courts will not hear this case based on theroy.
    The real issue is his Citizenship.

    We have put the cart before the horse, We the people, need to demand that the Immigration Department do their job. They need to determine his Citizenship! Then their findings can be brought to the Court for final ruling.

    Thank you so much for your insight, I will issue a complaint to INS that BHO is an illegal alien and go from there. I know it’s a long shot, INS did not do anything about his deported Aunt that is still here and has been for nearly 6 years! Getting any government agency to do their job is fruitless. Hopefully I can ask them to do their job, unlike how they have performed in regards to his aunt.

    To the other poster, please do enjoy the 20th and let’s all hope this doubt can be put to rest. We have too many other pressing issues burning at our gates.

    I will ask them to investigate fully a charge that he is not a U.S. Citizen based on fact he made public in his books and history, both have been written.

    Again, thank you!

  30. Emily says

    MaineSkeptic, you are truly dense. I have made more than one post, some contain facts, and some contain my opinions. Don't twist my words to work your spin. I know that game. Use it on a liberal. If you haven't seen any facts on the birth cert issue, it's because I haven't posted any. I've posted other facts. If you can't read, that's your problem.

    I would say one of the strongest pieces of evidence I "have" is Obama's own admission on his own website "fight the smears" wbere he admits that he was a british/kenyan citizen at birth. That is if you give weight to the precedent set in Wong Kim Ark and Minor. However, there are other items that could prove stronger if the courts allow the cases to proceed without blocking them. Are you familiar with Donofrio's argument or not? If not, read it at his website, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

    One thing that has never been defined is the manner of redress that citizens have when their rights have been violated. First Amendment gives the right of redress, but the manner has never been spelled out or defined. This is an issue which seems to be causing "standing" to bounce these court cases out of court.

  31. John says

    Emily,

    Go easy on Manic, he is trying to keep logic and order, which is what it will take to prevail. I do agree something seems rotten.

    Is there an INS expert in the house?

  32. Emily says

    MaineSkeptic are you Lan Lamphere? You sound like him.

  33. richCares says

    “I will issue a complaint to INS that BHO is an illegal alien and go from there.”

    Good Luck with that, but don’t give them your address or some guys with a Strait Jacket may show up at your door!

  34. acosta says

    Emily has all this fantastic info on Obama, we should nominate her to be head of Intelligence, wow she got all those agencies beat. She needs to turn all her information over to the inept agencies like CIA, FBI, and Police. Arrest warrants need to be issued on those Republican officials in Hawaii that illegally verified Obama’s Birth. We need to file charges against Supreme Court for refusing to stop Obama. All those newly named cabinet officials are in on it as well. Oh my gosh what a web of deceit that Emily has uncovered. She should be on Time Magazine cover instead of Obama. What a patriot, with all this valuable information she has uncovered she may be able to get a Pulitzer Prize out of this, maybe even keys to her wardroom at the mental hospital.

  35. Emily says

    Maineskcptic,

    (Par.1) get over it. I'm not angry. But dealing with idiots like you does frustrate me. And what I look like to you is none of my business. Keep it to yourself.

    (Par.2) Oh geez, same difference. I just mentioned that Obama admitted it, which just gives it more weight. Yes, you're splitting straws. His father was a Kenyan Citizen, yeah, that's enough. It's the same issue.

    (Par.3) It has not yet been proven that Obama was born on American soil. For SCOTUS to assume that only would prove they're friggin idiots. I hope they're not up to that. It isn't deferring to British law. It's deferring to the intent of the framers and our constitution, and only uses the definitions familiar to the founding fathers in writing the document. US sovereignty is taking precedence, that is if SCOTUS does their job.

    (Par 4) Well, if there isn't, we're not. But one honest judge is not enough. it takes, 4, or 5 anyway.

  36. MaineSkeptic says

    Sorry, Emily, I don't mind arguing facts — a quick review of this thread should prove that — but you are just too rude and hot-headed for me to waste my time on.

    Just a tip — get someone else to argue your case. You're not likely to convince anyone of anything with that rabid dog attitude.

  37. Emily says

    See ya, Lan. LOL

  38. Johann says

    @ Antonio Sosa

    Thanks, you have also provided excellent examples.

    I'll quickly list some of the recommendations from the Frankfurt School in Germany (1923), a think tank started to find a solution to the problem of resistance against implementation of communist ideologies. The solution? Political Correctness. It proposed:

    1. the creation of racism offences

    2. continual change to create confusion

    3. the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

    4. the undermining of schools and teachers' authority

    5. huge immigration to destroy national identity

    6. the promotion of excessive drinking

    7. emptying the churches

    8. an unreliable legal system with bias against the victim of crime

    9. dependency on the state or state benefits

    10. control and dumbing down of media

    11. encouraging the breakdown of the family

    Now tell me if some of these points sound familiar…

  39. Ted says

    The birth certificate issue is a GIANT RED HERRING (probably encouraged by Obama himself) TO DIVERT FROM THE REAL ISSUE — that is, BHO is NOT an Article II “natural born citizen” because his dad was a Kenyan/British citizen when Barack was born. Case closed.

  40. Ted says

    If 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse (that is, Obama is definitely NOT an Article II “natural born citizen” — dad Kenyan/British citizen at BHO’s birth –albeit he MAY BE a 14th Amendment “citizen”) with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor through other means to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a non-constitutional coup d’etat.

    SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.

  41. acosta says

    Some important dates:

    Election Nov 4: Obama won , Done

    Electoral College: Dec 15 Obama won , Done

    Congress Validates EV: Jan 8 due

    Berg case: Jan 12: final "Denied" by SCOTUS due

    Inauguration: Jan 20 Obama in with largest audience in History Cheering!

    Now the next step, I can’t teach pigs how to fly, so like MainSkeptic said like I’m out here!

  42. Emily says

    Antonio Sosa and Johann:

    Bravo! You have hit the nail on the head!

  43. Emily says

    Antonio Sosa —

    Thank you for posting this link:

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlB

    This is the best video I have ever seen on what is happening in America. it is exactly correct, and it is explained in the best way I have heard. Everyone should watch this, NOW!

  44. MaineSkeptic says

    By the way, John, if you’re still around, take a look at what Emily just wrote. I’m sure she believes every word of it. But it’s all name-calling, internet rumors, and unsubstantiated gossip, nothing that would ever help her in a legal process.

    If you are serious about pursuing an effective legal strategy, take care not to come off sounding like that!!

  45. Emily says

    MaineSkeptic, I don’t care if it’s anything that would help in a legal process. Many truths are of no help in a legal process because of the structure not allowing them. Does not dismiss the fact that it’s the TRUTH. And it is NOT rumors and unsubstantiated gossip. If this site would post my previous posts and not censor them, my more recent post would be more clear.

  46. MaineSkeptic says

    Emily, I understand what you’re saying, but spelling truth with all capital letters doesn’t prove anything, it just makes it look like you’re yelling.

    You know, some people are claiming that Obama is not legally qualified to be president, and that would have to be demonstrated in a court of law. So maybe *you* “don’t care if it’s anything that would help in a legal process,” but those of us who are seriously considering these questions care very much.

    Real evidence is appreciated. Hot air is not.

  47. Emily says

    Well, let’s try this again. richCares, you are awfully cocky for a novice. Real professionals are never that cocky. SCOTUS has not denied hearing the cases. They have not ruled on CERT. They have ONLY DENIED stopping, delaying or disrupting the electoral process. They have not ruled on Cert or the Order would have been published along with the pages of other Orders Denying Cert in other cases.

    Perhaps SCOTUS will deny cert, but my crystal ball is BROKE and I can’t tell. Maybe you could refer me to the occult shop that sold you yours. That is, if yours really works.

  48. Emily says

    richCares, also, perhaps you would ask your crystal ball why Obama has refused to release any of the normal documents that are released by any other presidential candidate, such as 1) a REAL birth certificate; 2) college applications; 3) thesis; 4) medical records; 4) selective service documents; 5) all college records, and many other documents which have been asked for which he has refused to release.

    And maybe your crystal ball can tell us why the Kenya government has sealed all of the records pertaining to Obama.

    I once heard a saying, “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.” Well, this pertains to Obama. I only wish he were no more dangerous than a duck. On that note, maybe your crystal ball can also tell us that while Obama has been in the US for years, why does he not have one regular guy-friend from his past (who is not a radical, communist, socialist, or terrorist or convicted criminal) who will step forward and vouch for his long-standing integrity? I think it’s interesting that he has none.

  49. MaineSkeptic says

    LOL, Emily, that’s an awful lot of words with not a single fact in it! Try once more, but then I have better things to do!

  50. John says

    Manic,
    Thanks for your advice. However your first advice seems more logical. We have put the cart before the horse. It can not be proved that BHO is not a citizen without evidence. The evidence is lock so the proof can not be offered. However, if I can trigger INS to do their duty, they can subpoena the records. They can then state the facts. Again, I am going on history and what is in BHO’s book. I am not asking if he is NBC, I am asking if he is a U.S. Citizen. If it is found that he is not a U.S. Citizen then he is not qualified. His records must be examined by the INS to find proof that at some point in his life he renounced his Indonesian Citizenship and renewed his U.S. Citizenship. The historical facts seem to point to the fact he or his mother did not do what was necessary to regain his U.S. Citizenship when he returned to Hawaii. His if he traveled to Pakistan on a U.S. Passport as an adult at age 20 and he had paperwork with INS when he returned to live with grandma, he is golden. If either or both can not be proved by BHO then INS must announce their findings. If they find that technically he is not a U.S. Citizen then any Court must hear the case that he is not qualified.

    If the INS will do their job, it put the burden of proof on BHO where it belongs. It is not up to Berg to prove he is not a U.S. Citizen. Berg is not seeking the office, BHO is seeking the office and must prove he is qualified. He has not offered that proof in this respect to the best of my knowledge or anyone’s knowledge.

    In my complain, I am not suggesting that he or anyone committed fraud by altering documents. I have no qualifications to prove such an assertion.

    But as a historian and a logical thinker, if he can not show INS documents to counter what I’m asserting then he is in deep trouble.

    I am now left to find out was it takes to trigger INS. I know my obligations as an employer to prove my workers are legal. I need to figure out how to report an Illegal alien to the INS and then be able to follow up to ensure they have done their job. If this happen, I am 99% sure that they will find technically he is not a U.S. Citizen. And, I have shifted the burden of proof on the right party. BHO should have no problem producing his documents to INS.

    To Johann,
    I agree with you!

1 2 3

You must be logged in to post a comment.