Originally published in 2002
The murder assignation of Pym Fortuyn by an environmentalist Nazi should, but it won’t be, called a “hate crime”. The Dutch candidate was a former Marxist and homosexual. He was a Dutch nationalist. Instead of being called a nationalist, he is called an “anti-immigration” candidate. The super sensitive souls of the Left aren’t calling this a “hate crime”, even though he was a homosexual, because he was against the loss of Dutch culture, and anti European Unionist. My question is quite simple, where are they? Why aren’t they doing what they always do when someone who is of the protected groups is murdered? That is sitting on bamboo mats, holding hands, strumming guitars and singing Kumbaya? After all, doesn’t this represent the epitome of hate? The epitome of intolerance? The epitome of a lack of political diversity? Or could it be that they really rejoice in this hero’s murder?
I am sure that we will hear the old cliche that they always use when one of them is caught in an act of extreme violence:”I disagree with what he did, but I can understand the reason for it”. When Allan Berg the Denver talkshow host who was murdered by the Order, we were barraged with the litany of propaganda about “how dangerous” “rightwing extremists are”. Yet here we have a political candidate taking part legally in the system being gunned down, and the analogies about the Left are not being drawn by the media. After all who is more violent than the Left? Given their history of violent revolution and genocide, I would think that we should be warned about the dangers of “violent Leftwing extremism”.
The killer was an “animal rights activist”, which means in realtalk that he feels that animals have more of right to live than people. This vicious killer is of the genre that thinks that the millions of babies, (mostly White) that are murdered in the abortuariums have no rights, but animals do! This two-legged animal is so sensitive to life that he can kill a human being to “save” the four legged kind. Makes sense to me, after all Hitler loved his dogs, but considered Jews “sub human”. The worldview of these vermin is so psychotic that they feel this “crusade” gives them some sick kind of “nobility”. St.Francis of Assisi loved animals and taught that they should be treated as humanely as possible. Yet he loved human beings more. Such is the difference between the paganism that these bags of human garbage believe in and Christian values. As society slips more and more into the abyss of paganistic beliefs we can expect more of this. Remember, pagans sacrificed human lives to placate mountain “gods”, trees, the sun, fertility of soil, etc. When we were a sane Christian society we looked askance at this behavior and congratulated ourselves that we had come so far in our moral and religious development. Today we are told that WE are the ones who are anachronistic in our beliefs, and THEY are the ones who are sensitive to the “environment” and “Mother Earth”. They cloak their paganism in the guise of “environmentalism”.
The cause of “national culture” has become one of contention throughout the Western world. As waves of third word immigrants wash over the shores of the West, we see the dilution of Western based cultures. We have people who have no connection to our heritage, nor to our religions, nor to our values. They live among us, but not with us. The issue is NOT the re-emergence of nationalism, but rather it is can the Left, which hates our society, continues to keep this fifth column growing among us. Isn’t “queer” as the song goes, that nationalism among non-Western nations is hailed by the Left as “independence”, while defense of Western culture is attacked so murderously by the same hypocrites? China has eruptions of “anti foreigner” campaigns periodically, and the Left stays silent, never calling it racist or xenophobic. In fact if you think about it, how can a kkkommunist nation like N.Korea, or Vietnam, or for that matter the outhouse we call Cuba, be nationalist? Marx taught that “nationalism will be gone as a political force in the twentieth century”. Yet nationalism is and has been the driving force in the twentieth century. Talk about a contradiction in Marxism!
It is reasonable and logical for a nation to keep its culture alive. People have an anchor to their society, and without it, they become rootless. This rootlessness is obvious in the growing crime and alienation in Western nations. Their values are constantly under attack. Youth are told that the West is responsible for all the world’s ills. With the hordes of invaders attacking the West the Left hopes to bring the West to it’s knees. These invaders have no common history to bond with the host nation. In fact as is the case with Mohammadanist it is a history of conflict. How then can they live with those whom they are taught are their historical enemies? Not to mention the strain on resources and programs. Where are the environmental bleeding hearts when it comes to these issues? Silent, of course!
National activist candidates are growing and so are their movements in the West. The Untied States will eventually see this happen here. The reason is because as we are squeezed out of our own country the political reality will effect everyone. Europe leads in this because the nations are smaller and therefore unchecked immigration is felt quicker. We still think that we have an unlimited amount of land and space. The Left which screams “hate crime”, every time a homosexual is murdered, will respond that his “sexuality” had nothing to do with this. Oh really, they why is it we are always told that the victim’s “sexuality” ALWAYS has something to do with it?
When there was a rash of political assignations in the sixties, we were always told that American society was “sick”. The Left as usual found it’s way to attack a nation that had self-doubts. What was sick about America at that time, according to the Left, was a nation that was Christian, that had one language, and accepted values and norms of behavior. Why don’t they now say, “the environmental movement is sick”? It is filled with violent behavior, and anti societal? The answer is because they agree with it! I will mourn for Pym Fortuyn, for even though I abhor some of his behavior, he loved his country and Western society. He said that “Islamic culture is backward”. He wanted to bring back the fur industry to the Netherlands. And he died for the truth. If you want me, I’ll be on my bamboo mat holding hands, strumming my guitar, and singing Kumbaya.
Thank You!
More from TRP
TRP Recommends
- America Will Adopt Socialism… and Die (WesternFront America)
- Lies and plenty of them (WesternFront America)
- Guns and America (WesternFront America)
No related posts.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.